"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote in message
news

I don't like secrets either, but I don't think the invasion of
Normandy
would've gone real well if it had been published in the newspapers a
week
ahead of time. The Manhattan Project might gone badly, too.

Citing examples of the past is no excuse for bad behavior in the
present/future.

Bad behavior? Don't you think SOME issues require secrecy? I'm not happy
with the idea that we resort to too many military solutions, but opinion
aside, how would some of these work if they were publicized beforehand?

No, employees should not keep job secrets from their employees, ever.
If something needs to be secreted from the employer (the taxpayers), it
shouldn't be done.

I'm not gonna get down in the mud, talking about Clinton.
You know damn well that most male employees would get fired on the spot
if
they had a lower female employee sucking their dick in the office on
company
time.

Well, first of all, if some people didn't have such a problem with his
wife's existence, nobody would care if SHE were sucking his dick on
company
time in the office. And second, I think the presidency is the type of job
where "company time" is 24x7.

If you or I got caught receiving head in the WH we would be brought up on
charges.
The president is not above the law.

be brought up on charges. Perhaps treason.

Agreed. Unfortunately, it'll never happen, although Nader is
suggesting
exactly this type of "cleansing".

The best we could hope for is that the next T-attack on the US would
take
out a majority of the politicians and then the rest of us could get on
with
the business of being human beings towards one another.

That would be nice, but unlikely as long as politicians depend on war for
their sexual excitement.