Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... Here's something to think about. Statement #1, below, is open to a wide range of interpretation. You may want to suggest some possible ones. But, tell me how many ways you can interpret #2. 1) "Things are going very badly at work lately". 2) "I have to leave for work in five minutes, but first, I want to see if the cucumber flowers have opened since I looked at them last night". Relevance? Dave Do the exercise and then I'll let you know what the relevance is. Hopefully, DSK won't give away the answers first. I'm not playing your games any more Doug. They're nothing more than deflection tactics. You STILL cannot make the case that you are legally authorized to kill someone's dog who craps on your grass. That is the ONLY point that needs to be made in this "discussion". Dave Poor guy. You're completely stumped by a simple thought exercise. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
Repost from Merc group | General |