Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice article, Chuck, but where is the live well? And, I don't recall reading
about the location of the rod holders. John H Sorry, John. This boat is more appropriate for folks aspiring to live well than those requiring a live well. As far as the "rod holders".......did you miss that part about the middle aged guy and his "passengers"? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not very well.
One of my neighbors down the canal from me has a Sundancer 290 which is a fun boat in many respects, but you can see the anchor pulpit flop up and down when punching through 2 to 3 foot waves. My guess is that it's only a matter of time before i Anchor pulpit? Visibly flopping up and down? My own guess is that a docking accident is more likely to blame than hull layup. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes on both counts. The boat is under powered, and the fuel capacity
of 225 gallons is on the light side for twin inboards of that size. Out this way, that 225 gallons provides more than adequate range for extended weekend cruising. We aren't making high speed 60 mile runs offshore like an East Coast, Gulf, or SoCal sportfisher. Our typical weekend boater would seldom cruise more than 50-70 nautical miles roundtrip. With prudent fuel management, that 225 gal would get a boater from Seattle to the San Juans and back. Barely. Adequate fuel capacity depends a lot on intended use. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... 4,000 RPM is way too fast for reliable operation and decent longevity on those motors. 3.200 to 3,400 RPM is generally regarded as maximum cruising speed for gas engines of that type. You feel the engine needs to be backed off to about 60% of WOT for normal cruise speed? It sounds under powered the way it was tested, and it's usually a mistake to buy an under powered boat. I'd personally order the boat with bigger gas engines if available, at about 350 hp each for decent cruising performance in the low to mid 20kt range. For frequent usage diesels would be an even better choice, and they will return 40 to 50% of their cost in resale value. I'd probably never buy a new gas boat myself, but millions of people do. If you recover 50% of a $50k upcharge, you still need to save a lot of fuel to cover the diff. If there was a single answer that was always right for everybody, there wouldn't be much variety in boats. :-) IU alsways wonder how can they cost $50k ($25k / engine) more? My new Duramax Diesel truck was only a $7k kicker for diesel, and that included an Allison automatic tranny. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
IU alsways wonder how can they cost $50k ($25k / engine) more? My new
Duramax Diesel truck was only a $7k kicker for diesel, and that included an Allison automatic tranny. New boats are priced according to a consistent standard: What will the market bear? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... IU alsways wonder how can they cost $50k ($25k / engine) more? My new Duramax Diesel truck was only a $7k kicker for diesel, and that included an Allison automatic tranny. New boats are priced according to a consistent standard: What will the market bear? Sorta like my new truck. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PS. Don't know if you take pictures while you're riding around, but I just
got a new Nikon D70 digital SLR, and I think it's fantastic! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! I shoot a couple of hundred photos per month for one project or another. With a keeper ratio of about 30-40%, and the paginator hoping for at least twice as many photos as anybody else thinks he'll need (or ultimately uses), it burns a lot of silver. Will go digital when: 1. Find a 35mm SLR digital, 5 megapixels (sp?) that will accept my Zeiss lenses. 2. Costs under a $geezel. If I drop one overboard or off the dock, I'd rather have an "unfortunate financial experience" than a mini disaster. $1k= unfortunate day at the office. $4k= mini disaster. So many of the digital cameras can take a photo of a housefly atop a flagpole at the other end of a football field- but cannot capture enough in wide angle mode to be useful for interior photos of a boat. With my 19mm lens I can stand at the edge of even very small compartments and get a photo that tells a lot about the interior.... Of course, that same lens makes the main salon on a 28 footer look as long as a bowling alley, so there's no perfect solution.......only a choice between available compromises. Much like boats in general -or other aspects of life. :-) |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off Topic: Republicans VS Democrats | General | |||
Off Topic RE Killfile | General | |||
on topic/off topic | General | |||
On Topic: Anniversary of Jack London's death | General | |||
For my on topic friends... | General |