Eisboch wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Gotta love it.How many square inches of the document will be blacked out
or deleted in ways that don't show...




Not much. Just saw it on MSNBC. Maybe a couple of names blacked out,

but

the rest stood.

Eisboch


Ahh. I have it:


When XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX told XXXXXXXXX XXXX about XXXXX bin XXXXX"X plan
to hijack airliners, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


I am sure that's what *your* imaginary copy looks like. Fortunately, the
rest of the world can see the real thing.

Eisboch

You mean, what the Bu****es say is the real thing. Frnakly, I don't
believe any of them. They lie about everything.

John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Ahh. I have it:


When XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX told XXXXXXXXX XXXX about XXXXX bin XXXXX"X plan to

hijack airliners, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


Actually, as you well know now (and likely knew full well when you spewed
the above), the entire doc is just a touch over a page in length, contains
naught but general references, and only five instances of redaction, all of
them clearly blanking the name of some intelligence agency or operative.
So, you record is intact.



You guys are kinda dense, eh?

Eisboch wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John Gaquin wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Ahh. I have it:


When XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX told XXXXXXXXX XXXX about XXXXX bin XXXXX"X plan

to

hijack airliners, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


Actually, as you well know now (and likely knew full well when you

spewed

the above), the entire doc is just a touch over a page in length,

contains

naught but general references, and only five instances of redaction, all

of

them clearly blanking the name of some intelligence agency or operative.
So, you record is intact.



You guys are kinda dense, eh?


No. Just reading and reporting the facts, jack, not listening to the spin.

Me again. (Eisboch)




I can't wait for the jokes following the Bush-Cheney tag team appearance....
Bush can't stand on his own two feet about much of anything...

John H wrote:

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:22:31 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:49:48 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
ay.rr.com...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


... a government official said Friday.


Hehehe. One of the Democrat's "anonymous sources" again? Lemme
guess...that piece of trash Ben-Veniste? It's funny how your side

makes

anonymous accusations as a way to test the waters...and it never goes
anywhere.

Nevertheless, it doesn't matter, because the White House is releasing

the

PDB from August 6th, 2001.


Ummm....they are "declassifying" it first, tooth-boy. "Releasing"

could

be

done in 5 minutes. "Declassifying", which means "cleaning it up",

will

take

longer.



Gotta love it.How many square inches of the document will be blacked

out

or deleted in ways that don't show...

Love the comments about Ben-Veniste, one of the sharpest people in
Washington, D.C., and someone a bit more knowledgeable than a 32
-year-old dentist in Retirement City, Florida.

Ben-Veniste is a political hack who can't put party politics aside even

when

given the important task of investigating the 9/11 attack. He has no

ethics

or morals. If you're referring to his knowledge about scuzzy politics,

then

you're right...he *is* more knowledgeable than I.


You must have watched the same programs as I.

I watched his "interrogation" of Condi Rice on C-Span. The idiot asked a
two-part question...and refused to even listen to Rice's answer on the first
part of the question.


That evening, Fox News s


Fox News?

Fox propaganda.

Joe wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


You mean, what the Bu****es say is the real thing. Frnakly, I don't
believe any of them. They lie about everything.


**** you bitch tits.




Ahhh. a Bush voter.

Harry Krause wrote:

You mean, what the Bu****es say is the real thing. Frnakly, I don't
believe any of them. They lie about everything.

Gosh, that's exactly the way it is with you.

-- Charlie

"Joe" wrote in message .. .
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


You mean, what the Bu****es say is the real thing. Frnakly, I don't
believe any of them. They lie about everything.

**** you bitch tits.

Showing your intelligence again, I see.