(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message ink.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
hlink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:
Path:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
link.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649
No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad, you
would
read
zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant
statement.
Simple
as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which is
what
my
statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded by
smoke.

Have any proof of that statement?

"I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how
you
are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would
read zero R.P.M.'s."

Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read
HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble?

What is your IQ? About two below plant life?

Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot?

Look slow mind grok this:

[YOU SAID]
I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you
are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would
read zero R.P.M.'s.

[I REPLIED]
Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and
still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower).

--
I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello
McFly? Anybody home?

You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero
R.P.M.'s."

And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read
zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about
bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems.

I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying
things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use
"mentally challenged".

So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster
stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would
read higher?

That is irrelevant to the argument that we are having over your ignorant
statement.

Sorry no cigar 'asskisser. We need to drop the subject because it
is straining your brain.

Idiot.

Wearing your blue-dress today Monica?

Put the liquor bottle down, Henry.

In article , (basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
hlink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:
Path:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message
link.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message news:P4Udc.3649
No you said words that indicated that "if the wiring were bad,
you
would
read
zero R.P.M's. And that is simply not true and an ignorant
statement.
Simple
as that. The wiring can be "bad" and still read something which
is
what
my
statement was saying numb numb. As usual your brain is clouded
by
smoke.

Have any proof of that statement?

"I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how
you
are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you
would
read zero R.P.M.'s."

Please show how, if the wiring were bad, that the tach would read
HIGHER. Can you? OR was that just drunken babble?

What is your IQ? About two below plant life?

Can't answer the question, can you, drunken idiot?

Look slow mind grok this:

[YOU SAID]
I would guess that it is the actual tach that is bad, seeing how you
are reading SOMETHING. I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would
read zero R.P.M.'s.

[I REPLIED]
Ever hear of excessive resistance? One can have "bad" wiring and
still get a reading...(albeit usually much lower).

--
I responded to JUST that paragraph of yours. Nothing else. Hello
McFly? Anybody home?

You stated that "I'd think if the wiring were bad, you would read zero
R.P.M.'s."

And since that simply is not true, the wiring can be "bad" and read
zero r.p.m.'s. Thus my response. I never said anything about
bad wiring being the cause of the original poster's problems.

I know it is hard for you. So I will stop being insensitive and saying
things like "dumb dumb" in reference to you. Better to use
"mentally challenged".

So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster
stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would
read higher?

That is irrelevant to the argument that we are having over your ignorant
statement.

Sorry no cigar 'asskisser. We need to drop the subject because it
is straining your brain.

Idiot.

Wearing your blue-dress today Monica?

Put the liquor bottle down, Henry.

A little club-soda will get those stains off dearie...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

So, I take it you simply didn't comprehend the part where the poster
stated that the tach read HIGHER????? Can you show my HOW it would
read higher?

It *is* possible.

Think for a change.