wrote:
'Twas written:

Forget this is a boating newsgroup asshole?

Harold


**********

No, as soon as I saw your post I immediately thought of a boating
newsgroup asshole.

If you meant to post, "Forget this is a boating newsgroup, asshole?"
you should have done so.


Hee hee... you still have it Chuck! Don't be shy about dishing it out
more often.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
wrote:
'Twas written:

Forget this is a boating newsgroup asshole?

Harold


**********

No, as soon as I saw your post I immediately thought of a boating
newsgroup asshole.

If you meant to post, "Forget this is a boating newsgroup, asshole?"
you should have done so.


Hee hee... you still have it Chuck! Don't be shy about dishing it out
more often.

I like goulds boatest stories. I'll never own one of those gold platers,
but I like to read about them. My idea of luxury would be a few more
batteries for my trolling motor.

Reply when you work up a good spin... I see you didn't earlier, but
maybe
you did, just to the wrong thread when you were confused.

*********

Reply to what?

"I've been around black folk all my life, they really do fit the
stereotypes, and anybody stating otherwise is just pushing a blind
agenda"?

No thanks. You've stated your piece, your position is clear, and those
who agree or disagree with you won't be swayed by additional discussion.

SoFarrell wrote:


I like goulds boatest stories. I'll never own one of those gold platers,
but I like to read about them. My idea of luxury would be a few more
batteries for my trolling motor.



Same here. I believe 'less is more' when it comes to boating. That is,
if you don't entertain large groups of people or regularly boat off shore.

wrote:

"I've been around black folk all my life, they really do fit the
stereotypes, and anybody stating otherwise is just pushing a blind
agenda"?


Who are you quoting? That's not what I wrote, or meant. That's some filter
you've got between your eyes and brain.

Oh well... you were so close to grasping it.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:32:46 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:14:55 -0400, John H
wrote:

No Chuck, you called *me* names and I *didn't* comment on the Jackson post!

Oh yeah, oh, yeah? Well.... *both* of you are gay child
molesters.....

...so, *there.*

Ever notice there is no digital component emulating a Bronx cheer....?
ahem...such a handicap.

Anyway, either of you buttheads been boating lately...? nudge, nudge,
hint, hint.....

Are you implying we molest only gay children? Sounds prejudicial to me!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 14 Jun 2005 17:35:51 -0700, wrote:

Very bizarre.

Let me get this straight: You claim I called you names because you
failed to comment about Michael Jackson. Is that correct?


Cute!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 14 Jun 2005 19:51:45 -0700, wrote:

Um, he was talking about Jesse, not Michael. Did you forget which
thread
you're posting in?

Try to keep up, OK?


*********
1. He commented.
2. I called him an "apologist." (I now realize that the term could have
considered an insult if one
is not familiar with the defintion).

Sorry, John H. Should I ever decide to call you names, I'll make them
short and common. :-)

At least make them sound complimentary!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 14 Jun 2005 21:14:20 -0700, wrote:

So you agree that you lost track of which thread you were participating
in?
It was Jesse, instead of Michael, right? Maybe you've over-extended
yourself a bit.

****

Yes, when John H said the "Jackson" thread, I assumed he meant the
Michael Jackson thread. It didn't initially occur to me he could have
been refering to the Jesse Jackson reference in what most would
consider the Mike Tyson thread.

I believe I used the phrase 'Jackson post', not 'Jackson thread'. If I said
'Jackson thread', then I can totally understand your confusion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 15 Jun 2005 08:11:53 -0700,
wrote:

Reply when you work up a good spin... I see you didn't earlier, but
maybe
you did, just to the wrong thread when you were confused.

*********

Reply to what?

"I've been around black folk all my life, they really do fit the
stereotypes, and anybody stating otherwise is just pushing a blind
agenda"?

No thanks. You've stated your piece, your position is clear, and those
who agree or disagree with you won't be swayed by additional discussion.

Is google too complicated for you, ****tard?

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account