| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Krause,
You are one sick racist. "HarryKrause" wrote in message news:1118539249.9fbec9343914c699b2595dd20111ba7c@t eranews... Ten Little ****** Boys went out to dine; One choked his little self, and then there were Nine. Nine Little ****** Boys sat up very late; One overslept himself, and then there were Eight. Eight Little ****** Boys traveling in Devon; One said he'd stay there, and then there were Seven. Seven Little ****** Boys chopping up sticks; One chopped himself in halves, and then there were Six. Six Little ****** Boys playing with a hive; A Bumble-Bee stung one, and then there were Five. Five Little ****** Boys going in for Law; One got in Chancery, and then there were Four. Four Little ****** Boys going out to Sea; A Red Herring swallowed one, and then there were Three. Three Little ****** Boys walking in the Zoo; The big Bear hugged one, and then there were Two; Two Little ****** Boys sitting in the Sun; One got frizzled up, and then there was One. One Little ****** Boy living all alone; He got married, and then there were None "*JimH*" wrote in message ... Repeat after me: Say "Fe-Fi-Fo" Scroll down Now say "Fe-Fi" Scroll down Again, say "Fe-Fi" Again scroll down Now say it all together "Fe - Fi -Fo -Fe -Fi -Fe- Fi" Scroll down Know what it is? Scroll down Mike Tyson giving his phone number. :-) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Five Little ****** Boys going in for Law;
One got in Chancery, and then there were "Four." Isn't that supposed to be "Fo"? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't that supposed to be "Fo"?
************ Not according to right wing apologist Herring and somebody else up the thread. They claim that the joke is simply about in individual speech impediment, (one you believe is also shared by Jesse Jackson). :-) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 06:21:10 -0400, John H wrote:
On 11 Jun 2005 23:17:37 -0700, wrote: Isn't that supposed to be "Fo"? ************ Not according to right wing apologist Herring and somebody else up the thread. They claim that the joke is simply about in individual speech impediment, (one you believe is also shared by Jesse Jackson). :-) Uncalled for and Krause-like, Chuck. Thought better of you. I don't, as a matter of fact, much of either Tyson or Jesse. On the other hand, I hold Mohammed Ali and Bill Cosby in the highest regard. Does that somehow show me to be racist? Or apologist? I'd expect such crap from Krause or basskisser. Edit: insert 'think' before 'much of either..." thanks -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
John H wrote:
I don't, as a matter of fact, much of either Tyson or Jesse. On the other hand, I hold Mohammed Ali and Bill Cosby in the highest regard. Does that somehow show me to be racist? Or apologist? I'd expect such crap from Krause or basskisser. Not so sure of Bill Cosby anymore.... http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,16080,00.html |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:49:35 GMT, Don White wrote:
John H wrote: I don't, as a matter of fact, much of either Tyson or Jesse. On the other hand, I hold Mohammed Ali and Bill Cosby in the highest regard. Does that somehow show me to be racist? Or apologist? I'd expect such crap from Krause or basskisser. Not so sure of Bill Cosby anymore.... http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,16080,00.html That was in March, and I think it's been cleared up. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, is it supposed to be funny because we're laughing at the ethnic
speech, or because we're laughing at a physical disability? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... So, is it supposed to be funny because we're laughing at the ethnic speech, or because we're laughing at a physical disability? Neither. It is funny because it is a joke Chuck. |
Hybrid Mode
