"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how did
you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how did
you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how did
you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of Cambodia, and
(SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force generals told Nixon
was not effective in any way after a certain point.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to
die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how did
you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of Cambodia,
and (SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force generals told
Nixon was not effective in any way after a certain point.

Grow up and read some history. Hopefully, you will read more than the
history of the last 40 years.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to
die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how
did you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of Cambodia,
and (SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force generals told
Nixon was not effective in any way after a certain point.

Grow up and read some history. Hopefully, you will read more than the
history of the last 40 years.



Let's put it this way: Legislators on both sides of the aisle were extremely
concerned about Nixon's behavior in Cambodia. And, don't spew any nonsense
about how the bombing, if continued, would've prevented the later genocide.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to
die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how
did you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of Cambodia,
and (SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force generals told
Nixon was not effective in any way after a certain point.

Grow up and read some history. Hopefully, you will read more than the
history of the last 40 years.



Let's put it this way: Legislators on both sides of the aisle were
extremely concerned about Nixon's behavior in Cambodia. And, don't spew
any nonsense about how the bombing, if continued, would've prevented the
later genocide.

Why is it nonsense. My father told me that Tet '68 was hell but that we
were beating the little ****ers now that they had come out into the open.
And, that if we had been allowed to chase them down and kill them the war
would have been over in a year or two. Instead the people of this country
were swayed by the almighty media and we went back into garrison and started
fighting a defensive war.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to
die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how
did you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of
Cambodia, and (SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force
generals told Nixon was not effective in any way after a certain point.

Grow up and read some history. Hopefully, you will read more than the
history of the last 40 years.



Let's put it this way: Legislators on both sides of the aisle were
extremely concerned about Nixon's behavior in Cambodia. And, don't spew
any nonsense about how the bombing, if continued, would've prevented the
later genocide.

Why is it nonsense. My father told me that Tet '68 was hell but that we
were beating the little ****ers now that they had come out into the open.
And, that if we had been allowed to chase them down and kill them the war
would have been over in a year or two. Instead the people of this country
were swayed by the almighty media and we went back into garrison and
started fighting a defensive war.


The Vietnamese had been tossing visitors out of their country for 200+ years
before we decided to stop by and help. They would never have surrendered.
And please - don't spew any bull**** about "we shoulda nuked 'em".

While we're on this subject, tell us in your own words how the Vietnamese
threatened us before we got there. And, be sure to tell us why you believe
the domino theory was valid.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:23:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


I guess to some $30,000 seems a sim. But it kinda makes you wonder
about
the connection between Bush's open door illegal worker policy and a
military drawn from mostly lower socio-economic classes. Keep the
pressure on them, offer them a few bucks, and send them off to
die...no
decent jobs around here anyway, eh?

Harry, in your review of articles to cut'n'paste this morning, how
did
you miss
this:


He missed this one too

ROFL!!! How deep was your head up your ass between 1970 and 1975???

Not as deep as yours!



So, you are pretending to forget about the "secret" bombing of
Cambodia,
and (SEPARATE ISSUE) the bombing of Hanoi which Air Force generals told
Nixon was not effective in any way after a certain point.

Grow up and read some history. Hopefully, you will read more than the
history of the last 40 years.

Liebral logic at play once again...LMAO