On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

On Tue, 24 May 2005 15:15:17 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.


Who said Kevin had no sense of humor? I think he's *really* humorous!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

And kevin wonders why he is the "KING"

On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)
=20
--=20
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?

wrote in message
oups.com...


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:26:27 -0400, "The Snapper Trapper"
wrote:

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?



Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!


Why did you tell him? That was too funny, and it could have gotten better!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

I can not make fun of the less fortunate. In some cultures people with
Kevin's infirmity are considered "special".


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:26:27 -0400, "The Snapper Trapper"
wrote:

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?



Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!


Why did you tell him? That was too funny, and it could have gotten better!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)