On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:31:18 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




John H wrote:



On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:





John H wrote:





Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?


You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.


I don't mean I read the headers for content, John. I don't see the
content. All I see is FROM and SUBJECT.

I can tell by the FROM that most of the garbage these days emanates from
the right-wingers? Why? Because before I filtered them out, they made
their positions apparent.

Nearly all the "anti-Krause rhetoric," as you call it, comes from the
right-wingers, and it is a result of their not approving of my politics
and my distaste for their idiot leader, Bushcrap.

Ergo, if it is anti-Krause rhetoric, it is almost for sure coming from
the right-wing here.


The subject is the title of the thread, Harry. Once someone changes the subject,
they've started a new thread. My point is that the 'subject' does not provide a
'direction' of the posts within the thread that are from the anti-Krauseites.

Harry, do you *really* believe the names you are called are reflective of your
simply being a Democrat?



John.

I don't care if it is a "new thread." If it is from the "usual
suspects," and they are ID'd in the FROM info, then it is right-wing
trashtalk. Especially these days.

No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.

Are you, then, saying that regardless of the thread title, *any* post from the
several anti-Krauseites you site are automatically anti-Krause because of your
politics?

I am not about to question your ability to write trash.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message ...
No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.


What's that cracking sound??? Oh, it's Krause's weenie arm breaking
as he frantically pats himself on the back.


CN

Logic and reason are the mortal enemy of the Left, who rely on
emotion and feelings.

On Sun, 22 May 2005 22:57:41 GMT, Don White wrote:

Capt. Neal® wrote:


Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN


Claims he's thinking of becoming a boater 6 or 7 years down the road.
I guess there's always hope.

Yes, there is.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On Sun, 22 May 2005 19:02:54 -0400, John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:31:18 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




John H wrote:



On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:





John H wrote:





Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?


You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.


I don't mean I read the headers for content, John. I don't see the
content. All I see is FROM and SUBJECT.

I can tell by the FROM that most of the garbage these days emanates from
the right-wingers? Why? Because before I filtered them out, they made
their positions apparent.

Nearly all the "anti-Krause rhetoric," as you call it, comes from the
right-wingers, and it is a result of their not approving of my politics
and my distaste for their idiot leader, Bushcrap.

Ergo, if it is anti-Krause rhetoric, it is almost for sure coming from
the right-wing here.


The subject is the title of the thread, Harry. Once someone changes the subject,
they've started a new thread. My point is that the 'subject' does not provide a
'direction' of the posts within the thread that are from the anti-Krauseites.

Harry, do you *really* believe the names you are called are reflective of your
simply being a Democrat?



John.

I don't care if it is a "new thread." If it is from the "usual
suspects," and they are ID'd in the FROM info, then it is right-wing
trashtalk. Especially these days.

No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.

Are you, then, saying that regardless of the thread title, *any* post from the
several anti-Krauseites you site are automatically anti-Krause because of your
politics?

I am not about to question your ability to write trash.

edit: site should be cite (I think!)

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

How lucky I am. My post earned consecutive replies from 2 renowned
diqueheads...Don Milquetoast White and Captain Asshole Neal.

A trifecta would be a reply from Harry Krause.

Can I be that lucky?




"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 22:57:41 GMT, Don White
wrote:

Capt. Neal® wrote:


Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN


Claims he's thinking of becoming a boater 6 or 7 years down the road.
I guess there's always hope.

Yes, there is.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
"*JimH*" wrote in
:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:



John H wrote:



Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to
show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The
point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply
because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't
you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't
mindless righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him
much, and I like his positions on issues even less, but he
certainly isn't a mindless rightie. But I do castigate him.
But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is
anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the
mindless righties here?

You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you
make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the
folks you continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet,
the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric
contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the
same folks names in
'response' to another's post.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John I want to slap you silly. A month ago you hated this
guy and exposed all his lies and insults. Now you are
playing footsie with him.

He has a history with the NG, documented by over 21,000 posts
OT of insults and put downs, all of which were directed to
those having an opposing opinion to his. Countless members
have attested to the same.

He has stalked me and my wife. He has posted our address and
claimed to have obtained pictures of our house. Later he
threatened us.

He did the same to MadCow.

He has insulted you. He has insulted most every member of
this NG.

So why the change in heart with this loser John? You are not
going to change him.

Once pond scum....always pond scum.

If your intention is to improve the tone in this NG you would
be better served to focus your attention elsewhere.

Don't be fooled by his sudden change of heart with you.

Wake up dude.




Up yours.

--
Impeach Bush

Check, mate. No further proof needed.

On Sun, 22 May 2005 19:31:42 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:31:18 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




John H wrote:



On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:





John H wrote:




On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:






John H wrote:






Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?


You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.


I don't mean I read the headers for content, John. I don't see the
content. All I see is FROM and SUBJECT.

I can tell by the FROM that most of the garbage these days emanates from
the right-wingers? Why? Because before I filtered them out, they made
their positions apparent.

Nearly all the "anti-Krause rhetoric," as you call it, comes from the
right-wingers, and it is a result of their not approving of my politics
and my distaste for their idiot leader, Bushcrap.

Ergo, if it is anti-Krause rhetoric, it is almost for sure coming from
the right-wing here.


The subject is the title of the thread, Harry. Once someone changes the subject,
they've started a new thread. My point is that the 'subject' does not provide a
'direction' of the posts within the thread that are from the anti-Krauseites.

Harry, do you *really* believe the names you are called are reflective of your
simply being a Democrat?



John.

I don't care if it is a "new thread." If it is from the "usual
suspects," and they are ID'd in the FROM info, then it is right-wing
trashtalk. Especially these days.

No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.


Are you, then, saying that regardless of the thread title, *any* post from the
several anti-Krauseites you site are automatically anti-Krause because of your
politics?


If they are "anti-Krause," it is because of my politics. That may not be
the immediate cause, but it sure is the underlying cause.



I am not about to question your ability to write trash.

Why, thank you!

Harry, I've written several posts that were less than complimentary both to you
and about you. I can't think of one where your political stance was of concern.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

Harry.Krause wrote:
Don White wrote:

Capt. Neal® wrote:



Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN




Claims he's thinking of becoming a boater 6 or 7 years down the road.
I guess there's always hope.



He'll still be a weenie.

That could be an insult to decent wennies everywhere!
He is a 'piece of work' who appears to be jealous of real boaters on
either coast.

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
No, it isn't simply because I am a Democrat. It is because I trash
their
fearful leader and their selfish, self-centered nonprinciples from time
to time. And I'm good it it.


What's that cracking sound??? Oh, it's Krause's weenie arm breaking
as he frantically pats himself on the back.

What is even more funny is he actually believes himself



CN

Logic and reason are the mortal enemy of the Left, who rely on
emotion and feelings.

Rick Eghardt wrote:

The real Don White. So proud of yourself for starting trouble in rec.boats.
Let it be known to the world what a scumbag you are.

Maybe I will just crosspost all of your crap to rec.boats.cruising.

Maybe someone there will tire of you and set your head straight.

Rick Eghardt


Isn't this odd!
Everytime I say something about JimH, my posts are thrown at rec.boats
cruising in an attempt to silence me. Could JimH (alais Dennis Compton,
alais his son Jeff etc) or one of his boyfriends, be responsible for
doing this?