The Snapper Trapper wrote:

I hate to tell you but both of them are just as obnoxious. How is the
anonymous poster using a string of profanity any different than you
tell a
boater and a regular contributor to the NG to go **** a sheep? For
over a
year, that was your response to everyone of Roger's posts.



Yep, I'll confirm that Harry did do that.

Wow, someone remembers those days. You've been here a long time. I'm
still reading somewhat of the newsgroup, but don't participate any
longer. The Bayliner wars of those days seem mild compared to the
vitriol these days.

Kindest regards, Roger.

On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:


Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]

I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:


Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it
was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that
there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few
folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one
could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


Ah, a list of those Harry Krause thinks less of, and all conservatives, and
all folks who have caught him in lies, stalking or other pathetic behavior.
How precious.

I bet that would be valued as much as his opinions about boats, especially
custom built 36 foot Zimmerman like boats. LOL!!

"Roger" wrote in message
...
The Snapper Trapper wrote:

I hate to tell you but both of them are just as obnoxious. How is the
anonymous poster using a string of profanity any different than you
tell a
boater and a regular contributor to the NG to go **** a sheep? For
over a
year, that was your response to everyone of Roger's posts.



Yep, I'll confirm that Harry did do that.

Wow, someone remembers those days. You've been here a long time. I'm still
reading somewhat of the newsgroup, but don't participate any longer. The
Bayliner wars of those days seem mild compared to the vitriol these days.

Kindest regards, Roger.

The pathetic saga of one Harry Krause continues.

Harry Krause is indeed on sick individual.

21,000 OT posts to this NG, most of which involved vulgarity or other
obnoxious replies. I always thought it was because of one's political views
(conservative) but now I find out it is also because of the make of boat one
owns.

Has he stalked you yet? He stalked me and my wife, posted our address's
here, somehow obtained a picture of our house (he admitted to doing the
same) and then threatened both me and my wife.

He did similar things to Madcow.

He just got done admitting he obtained information on where JohnH lives. I
guess Johns address will be published once Harry get in another snit with
him.

Krause's MO.

Pathetic.

On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:



Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?

You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:



John H wrote:



Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that
it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that
there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few
folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think
one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?

You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make
'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the
threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained
therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks
names in
'response' to another's post.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John I want to slap you silly. A month ago you hated this guy and exposed
all his lies and insults. Now you are playing footsie with him.

He has a history with the NG, documented by over 21,000 posts OT of insults
and put downs, all of which were directed to those having an opposing
opinion to his. Countless members have attested to the same.

He has stalked me and my wife. He has posted our address and claimed to
have obtained pictures of our house. Later he threatened us.

He did the same to MadCow.

He has insulted you. He has insulted most every member of this NG.

So why the change in heart with this loser John? You are not going to
change him.

Once pond scum....always pond scum.

If your intention is to improve the tone in this NG you would be better
served to focus your attention elsewhere.

Don't be fooled by his sudden change of heart with you.

Wake up dude.

"*JimH*" wrote in message ...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:



John H wrote:



Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that
it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that
there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few
folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think
one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?

You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make
'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the
threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained
therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks
names in
'response' to another's post.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John I want to slap you silly. A month ago you hated this guy and exposed
all his lies and insults. Now you are playing footsie with him.

He has a history with the NG, documented by over 21,000 posts OT of insults
and put downs, all of which were directed to those having an opposing
opinion to his. Countless members have attested to the same.

He has stalked me and my wife. He has posted our address and claimed to
have obtained pictures of our house. Later he threatened us.

He did the same to MadCow.

He has insulted you. He has insulted most every member of this NG.

So why the change in heart with this loser John? You are not going to
change him.

Once pond scum....always pond scum.

If your intention is to improve the tone in this NG you would be better
served to focus your attention elsewhere.

Don't be fooled by his sudden change of heart with you.

Wake up dude.



Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN

On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:31:18 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:50 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Sun, 22 May 2005 16:24:25 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On Sun, 22 May 2005 15:21:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




John H wrote:




Did you not read the post I made? I regurgitated it to show you that it was an
'anti-Krause' post, not a right-wing post at all. The point was that there is no
reason for you to castigate all conservatives simply because a few folks here
think you're a ....

I don't castigate "All" conservatives here.


Well, when you use phrases like 'mindless righties', don't you think one could
get the impression that you *do*?



Only if one is a mindless rightie. Those few who aren't mindless
righties know who they are.

As an example, there's Karl Denninger. I don't like him much, and I like
his positions on issues even less, but he certainly isn't a mindless
rightie. But I do castigate him. But, then, that wasn't your query.

Perhaps you need a list? :]


I suppose the concept of simply not calling names is anathema to you?



Isn't it enough for you, John, that I don't "play" with the mindless
righties here?


You don't consider mentioning names in every other post you make 'playing'? You
say you can determine the 'direction' of the abuse from the folks you
continuously name just by reading the headers. Yet, the headers of the threads
seldom give *any* indication of the anti-Krause rhetoric contained therein.

It seems more like you read the posts then start calling the same folks names in
'response' to another's post.


I don't mean I read the headers for content, John. I don't see the
content. All I see is FROM and SUBJECT.

I can tell by the FROM that most of the garbage these days emanates from
the right-wingers? Why? Because before I filtered them out, they made
their positions apparent.

Nearly all the "anti-Krause rhetoric," as you call it, comes from the
right-wingers, and it is a result of their not approving of my politics
and my distaste for their idiot leader, Bushcrap.

Ergo, if it is anti-Krause rhetoric, it is almost for sure coming from
the right-wing here.

The subject is the title of the thread, Harry. Once someone changes the subject,
they've started a new thread. My point is that the 'subject' does not provide a
'direction' of the posts within the thread that are from the anti-Krauseites.

Harry, do you *really* believe the names you are called are reflective of your
simply being a Democrat?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On Sun, 22 May 2005 18:36:18 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:

Snipped.

I am most familiar with all you say. Please, don't slap me. I'm not as naive as
you make me seem.


--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

Capt. Neal® wrote:


Sad how weenie JimH uses the newsgroup for a life because he has
no life.

CN


Claims he's thinking of becoming a boater 6 or 7 years down the road.
I guess there's always hope.