Harry,

I was asking you. Curious since you favor collective bargaining but seem to
despise professional sports or at least their compensation. I'm not sure how
important the player's issues are since they make a hell of a lot of money anyway.

In this case should a good player get the same pay increase as a poor player?
That seems to be the case in any union situation and that is the biggest problem
I have with it. The top producers in the unions who I have talked to (not
football) share the same sentiment.

Dan


Harry Krause wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:

Are you for or against collective bargaining in the NFL?

Harry Krause wrote:

Backyard Renegade wrote:


Harry Krause wrote in message



...

Eisboch wrote:

Thought maybe you might need some cheering up ....

http://members.cox.net/macallan_the/...ush1_Start.htm


Eisboch




Cripes...he can't even hold a hammer properly. What a stunatz!




I dunno, my dad was a master finish carpenter and I actually use
hammers all day. You on the other hand are nothing but a troll liar
who has probably never done a days work in his life, I doubt you would
know which end of the hammer goes up your ass...





Actually, I wouldn't know which end of a hammer one puts up one's butt.
But I'm certain you know.
As for mechanical job skills (that seems to be what you are alluding to
in your semi-literate post), I have in my wallet a card with my name on
it for one of the skilled building trades unions that one can only get
after either completing a four-to-five year apprenticeship program OR
passing a four day classroom and practical skills examination and
demonstration. I am a member in good standing in that union, but my
status is inactive. I could in very short order weld together from rebar
a nice little cage in which to display you as a close relative of the
missing link. You do have that sloping forehead, right?






Are you asking me? I don't follow professional football, so I am not
familiar with the issues of the players, but I am in favor of collective
bargaining.