Calif Bill wrote:
Just read your opinions over the last couple of years and you will see the
inference.

Your inference is wrong. Not everybody that hates Bush likes Clinton.


How would you even speculate that it would not have happened. It was
already attempted to take down the WTC with a truck bomb.


Yes, that's true. It was a much smaller operation. And the right-wing
loudmouths often overlook the fact that the people who did it are in
jail... and have been since long before Bush took office.


... And the planing
and training for 9/11 had to take more than 9 months.

Sure... the real crazies have been out there, and working devotedly, for
a long time. But when Bush won the election, the behind the scenes
people who can get serious about planning & financing such a large
operation got involved where they might have stayed out. Look who
benefitted financially from the Sept 11th attacks.


... You have to be really
biased to think it would not have happened under another candidate. Hell,
the Muslim extremists are waging war all over the world on those they figure
are not pure and chosen. Look at Algeria. 100 of thousands to killed and
mutilated people. They of the wrong branch of Islam.


Yes but many of those particular crazies are not into attacking *us*.




The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK




The Secret Service always tried to keep the President out of harms way. And
you have planes crashing into buildings in different parts of the USA and
you think he is not in danger?

The President was in less danger than anybody in NYC or DC. And sure,
it's their job to get him out of danger... but he's the President. A
leader, a brave man, would have looked at the situation and said, 'there
is no immediate threat. Let's think this over and take some action.'
Instead he simply ran like a rabbit, making several false public
statements and being led around by the nose.

That's chicken****.

Maybe that's a bit harsh... let's just say it falls far short of the
standard of leadership I expect... and that the U.S. needs.

DSK

On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:20:21 -0500, DSK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
Just read your opinions over the last couple of years and you will see the
inference.

Your inference is wrong. Not everybody that hates Bush likes Clinton.


How would you even speculate that it would not have happened. It was
already attempted to take down the WTC with a truck bomb.


Yes, that's true. It was a much smaller operation. And the right-wing
loudmouths often overlook the fact that the people who did it are in
jail... and have been since long before Bush took office.


... And the planing
and training for 9/11 had to take more than 9 months.

Sure... the real crazies have been out there, and working devotedly, for
a long time. But when Bush won the election, the behind the scenes
people who can get serious about planning & financing such a large
operation got involved where they might have stayed out. Look who
benefitted financially from the Sept 11th attacks.


... You have to be really
biased to think it would not have happened under another candidate. Hell,
the Muslim extremists are waging war all over the world on those they figure
are not pure and chosen. Look at Algeria. 100 of thousands to killed and
mutilated people. They of the wrong branch of Islam.


Yes but many of those particular crazies are not into attacking *us*.




The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK




The Secret Service always tried to keep the President out of harms way. And
you have planes crashing into buildings in different parts of the USA and
you think he is not in danger?

The President was in less danger than anybody in NYC or DC. And sure,
it's their job to get him out of danger... but he's the President. A
leader, a brave man, would have looked at the situation and said, 'there
is no immediate threat. Let's think this over and take some action.'
Instead he simply ran like a rabbit, making several false public
statements and being led around by the nose.

That's chicken****.

Maybe that's a bit harsh... let's just say it falls far short of the
standard of leadership I expect... and that the U.S. needs.

DSK

How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"John H" wrote in message
...


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.

It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.

Doug Kanter wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.


It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.



It's Chrisfield's, actually, and I'm pretty sure lobster isn't on the
menu. But Bush could have choked on a "arster" shell.

On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 12:53:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.


It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.



It's Chrisfield's, actually, and I'm pretty sure lobster isn't on the
menu. But Bush could have choked on a "arster" shell.

Speaking of lobsters, can you tell me about your lobster boat? Is
Rockhold the creek in which you keep it? I'd love to see it.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.


It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.



It's Chrisfield's, actually, and I'm pretty sure lobster isn't on the
menu. But Bush could have choked on a "arster" shell.

Why no lobster? Don't they ship any in from up North?

On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:27:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.

It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.


Thank God for sanity!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:27:56 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


How the hell could Bush or the Secret Service have possibly said,
"There is no immediate threat" as long as airplanes were still flying
around the country?

This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous.

It's a non-issue. They could've simply taken him to Christfield's, an
excellent seafood place in Silver Springs, and he would've been safe.
However, I think he would choked on a lobster claw, so perhaps it *was*
better that they got him onto an airplane.


Thank God for sanity!

John H

I guess. He also could've poked himself in the eye with the lobster tool.

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:13:20 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
This "Bush was a coward" stuff is totally inane. You folks say it to
keep your lib circle jerk going, but it's ridiculous

Umm, yeah, sure. John. You can either say that the President was in
imminent danger, which is BS, or that he was ordered to flee by
underlings, which is pretty much the truth.

Neither changes the fact that on Sept 11th, President George Bush Jr was
a disgrace. He acted like a chicken****. And that's a fact. You don't
like it, tough.

You have pretty much shown that Bush and/or Cheney could **** on your
dinner table and you'd pass the toilet paper and ask which fork to use.
Why should your opinion carry any weight?

DSK

Jerk, jerk, jerk, jerk......

This crap throws your credibility in the same pot as Harry's and
b'asskisser's.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!