Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

"Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
news
NOYB wrote:
As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record,


Really? Are you proud of his arrest record? Are you proud of his
grandfather's record of selling war materials to Nazi Germany?

More recently, how about his record of running and hiding when the US
was actually under attack? That is something to be proud of all right.
snip
DSK


SOP. The plane that crashed in PA was headed for the White House.


I don't believe that, at the time of the attacks, anybody knew WHERE
that plane was headed.
  #2   Report Post  
Jim--
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

thlink.net...
"DSK" wrote in message
news
NOYB wrote:
As a Conservative Republican, I'm very proud of Bush's record,

Really? Are you proud of his arrest record? Are you proud of his
grandfather's record of selling war materials to Nazi Germany?

More recently, how about his record of running and hiding when the US
was actually under attack? That is something to be proud of all right.
snip
DSK


SOP. The plane that crashed in PA was headed for the White House.


I don't believe that, at the time of the attacks, anybody knew WHERE
that plane was headed.


If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed it?
I think so.

You talk about others goose stepping and wearing blinders. Take a look in
the mirror bud.


  #3   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed it?
I think so.


Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK

  #4   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed

it?
I think so.


Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


Its EZ 2 memorize.


  #5   Report Post  
Calif Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed

it?
I think so.


Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was still
in office. No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.
Bill




  #6   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then

believed
it?
I think so.


Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was

still
in office. No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.
Bill



DSK said nothing of the sort. "You people" only think in black or white.


  #7   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

Calif Bill wrote:
You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was still
in office.


Please point out where & when I ever said any such thing.


... No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.


Actually, there is very good reason to think that Sept 11th would not
have happened if anybody except G.W.Bush had been elected in 2000. His
business dealings with the Taliban and the Saudis, and his carte-blanche
backing of Israel, were precipitating factors.

But hey, that's just my speculation. Based on careful observation and
historical perspective, but still just speculation.

The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK


  #8   Report Post  
Calif Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Calif Bill wrote:
You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was

still
in office.


Please point out where & when I ever said any such thing.



Just read your opinions over the last couple of years and you will see the
inference.


... No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.


Actually, there is very good reason to think that Sept 11th would not
have happened if anybody except G.W.Bush had been elected in 2000. His
business dealings with the Taliban and the Saudis, and his carte-blanche
backing of Israel, were precipitating factors.

But hey, that's just my speculation. Based on careful observation and
historical perspective, but still just speculation.


How would you even speculate that it would not have happened. It was
already attempted to take down the WTC with a truck bomb. And the planing
and training for 9/11 had to take more than 9 months. You have to be really
biased to think it would not have happened under another candidate. Hell,
the Muslim extremists are waging war all over the world on those they figure
are not pure and chosen. Look at Algeria. 100 of thousands to killed and
mutilated people. They of the wrong branch of Islam.



The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK



The Secret Service always tried to keep the President out of harms way. And
you have planes crashing into buildings in different parts of the USA and
you think he is not in danger? Watch the tapes of any assassination or
attempt to assassinate the President and watch the Secret Service get him
out of danger.


  #9   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:10:08 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was

still
in office.


Please point out where & when I ever said any such thing.



Just read your opinions over the last couple of years and you will see the
inference.


... No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.


Actually, there is very good reason to think that Sept 11th would not
have happened if anybody except G.W.Bush had been elected in 2000. His
business dealings with the Taliban and the Saudis, and his carte-blanche
backing of Israel, were precipitating factors.

But hey, that's just my speculation. Based on careful observation and
historical perspective, but still just speculation.


How would you even speculate that it would not have happened. It was
already attempted to take down the WTC with a truck bomb. And the planing
and training for 9/11 had to take more than 9 months. You have to be really
biased to think it would not have happened under another candidate. Hell,
the Muslim extremists are waging war all over the world on those they figure
are not pure and chosen. Look at Algeria. 100 of thousands to killed and
mutilated people. They of the wrong branch of Islam.



The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK



The Secret Service always tried to keep the President out of harms way. And
you have planes crashing into buildings in different parts of the USA and
you think he is not in danger? Watch the tapes of any assassination or
attempt to assassinate the President and watch the Secret Service get him
out of danger.


According to my hero, Michael Moore, the second most honest person in
the world (Harry K being the first, since he has a secret lobsta boat)
many of the 9/11 folks were here for two years.

But, Bush was probably the one that got them here.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
  #10   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory

Calif Bill wrote:
Just read your opinions over the last couple of years and you will see the
inference.


Your inference is wrong. Not everybody that hates Bush likes Clinton.


How would you even speculate that it would not have happened. It was
already attempted to take down the WTC with a truck bomb.



Yes, that's true. It was a much smaller operation. And the right-wing
loudmouths often overlook the fact that the people who did it are in
jail... and have been since long before Bush took office.


... And the planing
and training for 9/11 had to take more than 9 months.


Sure... the real crazies have been out there, and working devotedly, for
a long time. But when Bush won the election, the behind the scenes
people who can get serious about planning & financing such a large
operation got involved where they might have stayed out. Look who
benefitted financially from the Sept 11th attacks.


... You have to be really
biased to think it would not have happened under another candidate. Hell,
the Muslim extremists are waging war all over the world on those they figure
are not pure and chosen. Look at Algeria. 100 of thousands to killed and
mutilated people. They of the wrong branch of Islam.



Yes but many of those particular crazies are not into attacking *us*.




The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK




The Secret Service always tried to keep the President out of harms way. And
you have planes crashing into buildings in different parts of the USA and
you think he is not in danger?


The President was in less danger than anybody in NYC or DC. And sure,
it's their job to get him out of danger... but he's the President. A
leader, a brave man, would have looked at the situation and said, 'there
is no immediate threat. Let's think this over and take some action.'
Instead he simply ran like a rabbit, making several false public
statements and being led around by the nose.

That's chicken****.

Maybe that's a bit harsh... let's just say it falls far short of the
standard of leadership I expect... and that the U.S. needs.

DSK



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" Jim General 3 March 7th 04 07:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017