"DSK" wrote in message
. ..

Really? Are you proud of his arrest record?



NOYB wrote:
Big deal. By the time we graduated from high school, 1/3 of my
graduating
had been "arrested" for underage drinking while in high school.

Ah, so now you're saying that you think it is morally OK to set an
example of boozing irresponsibly... driving while drunk among other
things... for today's young people?




Are you proud of his
grandfather's record of selling war materials to Nazi Germany?


His




What, did speech fail you? It's true, matter of record. Prescott Bush
paid a fine out of court rather than be charged with trafficking with an
enemy state. But then the Bush family was not as rich nor as powerful as
they are now. What sort of parallel can be drawn form this, given the
free ride that the Bin Laden family and Saudi business connections have
been getting?




More recently, how about his record of running and hiding when the US
was actually under attack?


He was a target you doofus.

Really? That was proclaimed loudly but so far there is no evidence at
all.... none... just another excuse and another lie.



That is something to be proud of all right.

But that's all old news. Let's talk about the present. How about Bush's
vetoing spending money on intel & security?


He did no such thing.

Really? Why did they cut funding for DARPA, a key military intelligence
project? What about the CDC's funding for emergency equipment & training
for counter-bioterror programs? What about the roll back on airport
security? Cutting funds for updating the CIA and FBI computer systems?

The list goes on. Bush is spending gazillions on war in Iraq, which
posed only very slight terrorist threat to the US. However, when it
comes to actually taking steps to combat terrorist groups, with money
that will not be funneled into the pockets of his supporters, he doesn't
give a rat's patootie.




That might really help fight
terrorism, but he nixed it.


Lie.

Unfortunately it's all true.


How about his record of ignoring... and even

falsifying... military casualties?


Lie.

Nope, true again.


How about his record of stonewalling the Sept 11 investigation?


Bull****.

Oh? Why then has Bush refused to meet with them? So far he's given a
string of statements about his dignity, and executive priviledge... he
puts his dignity above America's safety, his priviledges above the
truth... apart from that disturbing & undeniable fact, what does he have
to hide?

So far, the Bush Administration has given minimal coopoeration with the
9-11 investigation. They've even had to get court orders.


His
record of going on vacation more than any other President, ever?


So what.

Interesting set of priorities.

His

record of lying about many things, from the Clinton staff vandalizing
the White House


another lie. Check with the GAO. Their report shows it happened just
as he
says it happened.

Umm, no. Their report said NONE of it happened.



to his declaration that he would not use Sept 11th
politically?


Where'd he say that?

About fifteen times, from two years ago until about two months ago.


How his record of bragging about his foreign policy
success, while stabbing his own Secretary of State in the back and
driving a wedge between the US and our longest & closest allies?


The wedge has been there for some time. I'm glad he just exposed the
phonies for what they are...backstabbing ingrates.

An interesting attitude.

But the FACT remains that his policies have failed. We have regime
change in Spain (and possibly coming up in Britain) and made a lot of
new enemies, but have not ended the first threat.

So we see... you are pro-Bush to the point of denying very obvious and
easily verifiable fact... in your opinion, the Bush family should come
first above the good of the rest of the country. In your opinion, lies
and profiteering are fine *if* the guys you like are doing it.

DSK


Oh, I get it, you took all the stuff about Kerry and replaced the name with
bush.