OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately needed
one.

Al Qaeda is no longer the same entity it was in the past, nor does it need
to be. You really need to listen to more news sources. I've told you this
before. When your knowledge has as much depth as a saltine cracker, you
sound like a fool. The terrorists rounded up in Spain appear to be
associated with a me-too group from Morocco. AQ may cheer, but it seems they
had little to do with the train bombing. Similar to the situation in Israel
where multiple groups raise their hands and take credit for the latest
suicide bombing.

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed
it?
I think so.

Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


Its EZ 2 memorize.

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the
hell
he
is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or the
world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position than
we've
been in since the early days of World War II.

And we all know how that conflict turned out!



Irrelevant. Like comparing molars to watermelons.


Sure it is, Doug.



I see. In WWII, Hitler was already marching through Europe by the time we
got involved. We didn't need to do ANYTHING to collect allies. Please
describe how this compares to the current situation, where we have a list of
"allies", 99% of whom have contributed nothing but an agreement to not
criticise the effort.

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then believed
it?
I think so.

Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was still
in office. No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.
Bill

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Jim-- wrote:
If it happened when Clinton was in office, would you have then
believed
it?
I think so.

Here's the real problem. For most of these people, 3+ years later, it's
*still* about Clinton.

DSK


You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was
still
in office. No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.
Bill



DSK said nothing of the sort. "You people" only think in black or white.

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

The terrorist care. The message coming out of all of the terror groups
linked to al Qaeda is that the Spanish elections were a great victory
for
them. It was a morale-booster at a time when al Qaeda desperately
needed
one.

Al Qaeda is no longer the same entity it was in the past, nor does it need
to be. You really need to listen to more news sources. I've told you this
before. When your knowledge has as much depth as a saltine cracker, you
sound like a fool. The terrorists rounded up in Spain appear to be
associated with a me-too group from Morocco. AQ may cheer, but it seems
they
had little to do with the train bombing.

Like every other news story out there, I wrote: "...the terror groups
*linked* to al Qaeda".

Are you claiming that Abu Hafs al-Masri has no affiliations with al Qaeda?

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the
hell
he
is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or
the
world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position than
we've
been in since the early days of World War II.

And we all know how that conflict turned out!



Irrelevant. Like comparing molars to watermelons.


Sure it is, Doug.



I see. In WWII, Hitler was already marching through Europe by the time we
got involved. We didn't need to do ANYTHING to collect allies. Please
describe how this compares to the current situation, where we have a list
of
"allies", 99% of whom have contributed nothing but an agreement to not
criticise the effort.

bin Laden's army's have marched through dozens of countries that have been
the victim of terrorist attacks from radical muslim groups. See the
similarity now?

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:07:53 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Are you claiming that Abu Hafs al-Masri has no affiliations with al Qaeda?

Well, his daughter is married to bin Laden's son.

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

Calif Bill wrote:
You people think it would be nirvana if Clinton (or his surrogate) was still
in office.

Please point out where & when I ever said any such thing.


... No 9/11, no rescession, no job loss.

Actually, there is very good reason to think that Sept 11th would not
have happened if anybody except G.W.Bush had been elected in 2000. His
business dealings with the Taliban and the Saudis, and his carte-blanche
backing of Israel, were precipitating factors.

But hey, that's just my speculation. Based on careful observation and
historical perspective, but still just speculation.

The FACT is that Bush acted like a chicken**** on Sept 11th. Anybody can
see that, but some prefer to deny the obvious.

DSK

OT--al Qaeda already claiming Aznar's defeat as victory
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
. com...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Bush *is* the epitome of Crusader evil. He doesn't know what the
hell
he
is doing. He's done nothing at all to make the United States or
the
world safer. In fact, he's put all of us in a worse position
than
we've
been in since the early days of World War II.

And we all know how that conflict turned out!



Irrelevant. Like comparing molars to watermelons.


Sure it is, Doug.



I see. In WWII, Hitler was already marching through Europe by the time
we
got involved. We didn't need to do ANYTHING to collect allies. Please
describe how this compares to the current situation, where we have a
list
of
"allies", 99% of whom have contributed nothing but an agreement to not
criticise the effort.

bin Laden's army's have marched through dozens of countries that have been
the victim of terrorist attacks from radical muslim groups. See the
similarity now?



Apparently, the countries they've marched through don't feel threatened.
Care to list the dozens, and compare that list to the few who have chosen to
send troops to Iraq?