Dreaming of Virgins
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.

Dreaming of Virgins
 

On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Dreaming of Virgins
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Dreaming of Virgins
 

On 22 Mar 2004 12:59:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Dreaming of Virgins
 

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H


It might be best to just say "STFU" to basskisser and leave it at that. I have
him filtered, so I don't have to deal with his nonsense.

Butch Ammon

Dreaming of Virgins
 

On 22 Mar 2004 22:47:23 GMT, 123 (Butch Ammon) wrote:

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H


It might be best to just say "STFU" to basskisser and leave it at that. I have
him filtered, so I don't have to deal with his nonsense.

Butch Ammon

A spectacular idea!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Dreaming of Virgins
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 12:59:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H

Yes, as usual. Nothing to say, but you say it anyway!

Dreaming of Virgins
 

Dreaming of Virgins
 

On 23 Mar 2004 05:01:22 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 12:59:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H

Yes, as usual. Nothing to say, but you say it anyway!

b'asskisser, STFU.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Dreaming of Virgins
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On 23 Mar 2004 05:01:22 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 12:59:41 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 06:41:23 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:


Charles wrote in message
...


You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?

If you think so, you're a dolt.

-- Charlie

Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.


I've met him.

John H

So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.

Did you make a few assumptions there, b'asskisser? Aren't you the one
usually asking for proof positive and full research before accepting
an assumption.

What assumption did I make, John? You have stated above, in response
to someone saying you can't judge someone by what they right in a
newsgroup, that you've met him. So what? I've met many, many people,
and I certainly couldn't, or wouldn't judge them just because I've met
them. You on the other hand, certainly aren't above judging someone
based entirely on this newsgroup.

Do I know *all* about Harry? No. I don't, for example, know what his
lobster boat looks like. Can you find names, other than highly
complimentary, that I've called Harry?

Where did I say you called him names, John? Are you losing it again?

Can I find fault with Harry? You bet. Harry, like you, has a penchant
for calling names and speaking ill of people. That's judgement enough
for my purposes.

I'm certainly glad to hear that you think of yourself as that high and
mighty, that you can judge people. Most people understand that in
order to judge someone, you need to know a tad more about them, than
what they write in a newsgroup.


I'm glad you're glad.

John H

So you are saying that you DO think of yourself as high and mighty,
and you DO think you can judge someone's character by what they write
in a newsgroup? If that were true, then YOU would certainly have a lot
of people (most, in fact) thinking you were a conceited blow hard.

Whatever turns you on, b'asskisser.

John H

Yes, as usual. Nothing to say, but you say it anyway!

b'asskisser, STFU.

John H

Once again. As you usually do, when you start losing a debate, you
start slinging crap. AND, I'd LOVE to see you try and make me STFU.
You've once again proven yourself nothing short of a blowhard dolt.