| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:jpH5c.43135 And if I am senile, then I have an excuse. Bill Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things. If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid. Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations, without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a mental problem? Yes you do. Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and assumptions about others. How about this one: ************************************************ On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White" wrote: Charles wrote in message ... You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his fellow citizens? If you think so, you're a dolt. -- Charlie Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this group is what they write. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too many people trolling just to agitate others. I've met him. John H So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow. ************************************************** *************************** Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption about what I do or don't know? John H IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes, that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow. You said, "...you know all about him..." I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all the bull****. John H So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
On 23 Mar 2004 05:03:50 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:jpH5c.43135 And if I am senile, then I have an excuse. Bill Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things. If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid. Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations, without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a mental problem? Yes you do. Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and assumptions about others. How about this one: ************************************************ On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White" wrote: Charles wrote in message ... You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his fellow citizens? If you think so, you're a dolt. -- Charlie Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this group is what they write. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too many people trolling just to agitate others. I've met him. John H So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow. ************************************************** *************************** Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption about what I do or don't know? John H IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes, that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow. You said, "...you know all about him..." I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all the bull****. John H So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? Did I say that, or are you answering your own questions? John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
basskisser wrote: So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day long. -- Charlie |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 23 Mar 2004 05:03:50 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:jpH5c.43135 And if I am senile, then I have an excuse. Bill Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things. If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid. Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations, without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a mental problem? Yes you do. Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and assumptions about others. How about this one: ************************************************ On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White" wrote: Charles wrote in message ... You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his fellow citizens? If you think so, you're a dolt. -- Charlie Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this group is what they write. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too many people trolling just to agitate others. I've met him. John H So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow. ************************************************** *************************** Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption about what I do or don't know? John H IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes, that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow. You said, "...you know all about him..." I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all the bull****. John H So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? Did I say that, or are you answering your own questions? John H Yes, you did. Can't follow what you've written? It was written to you, that all you can judge people on here is what they write. It was further stated that you have to, because of this, give them the benefit of the doubt. YOU said, "I've met him", alluding to the fact that, because you've met him, you can judge him, correct? If not, why would you have made that statement in reference to JUDGING someone? |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
On 23 Mar 2004 11:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . .. On 23 Mar 2004 05:03:50 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:jpH5c.43135 And if I am senile, then I have an excuse. Bill Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things. If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid. Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations, without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a mental problem? Yes you do. Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and assumptions about others. How about this one: ************************************************ On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White" wrote: Charles wrote in message ... You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his fellow citizens? If you think so, you're a dolt. -- Charlie Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this group is what they write. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too many people trolling just to agitate others. I've met him. John H So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow. ************************************************** *************************** Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption about what I do or don't know? John H IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes, that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow. You said, "...you know all about him..." I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all the bull****. John H So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? Did I say that, or are you answering your own questions? John H Yes, you did. Can't follow what you've written? It was written to you, that all you can judge people on here is what they write. It was further stated that you have to, because of this, give them the benefit of the doubt. YOU said, "I've met him", alluding to the fact that, because you've met him, you can judge him, correct? If not, why would you have made that statement in reference to JUDGING someone? Does the "it" you use refer to my writing? If not, then I didn't say it, did I? Now, stfu. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
Jim: Must you start every one of your off-topic threads with a
copyright violation? It's one thing to point people to an article with an excerpt and a source (a link is nice). But when all you do is post articles, in their entirity, without any comment, you simply look like you don't have an original thought in your head. How many on-topic post have you made in the last seven days? Why do you need to copy entire articles, in violation of copyrights, to rec.boats. There are hundreds of newsgroups where this stuff is on-topic, why don't you go to one of those groups? |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 23 Mar 2004 11:33:43 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 23 Mar 2004 05:03:50 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:jpH5c.43135 And if I am senile, then I have an excuse. Bill Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things. If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid. Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations, without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a mental problem? Yes you do. Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and assumptions about others. How about this one: ************************************************ On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White" wrote: Charles wrote in message ... You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his fellow citizens? If you think so, you're a dolt. -- Charlie Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this group is what they write. You have to give people the benefit of the doubt. On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too many people trolling just to agitate others. I've met him. John H So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow. ************************************************** *************************** Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption about what I do or don't know? John H IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes, that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow. You said, "...you know all about him..." I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all the bull****. John H So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? Did I say that, or are you answering your own questions? John H Yes, you did. Can't follow what you've written? It was written to you, that all you can judge people on here is what they write. It was further stated that you have to, because of this, give them the benefit of the doubt. YOU said, "I've met him", alluding to the fact that, because you've met him, you can judge him, correct? If not, why would you have made that statement in reference to JUDGING someone? Does the "it" you use refer to my writing? If not, then I didn't say it, did I? Now, stfu. John H Holy ****, John! That's almost as good of an explanation as Clinton's famous "it depends on what the definition of "is" is! As far as intelligently debating goes, your "stfu" is about as intelligent as YOU get. |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them? I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day long. -- Charlie If you are "beginning to believe" that, may I suggest you seek some professional help? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Leader length for trolling | General | |||
| Birthdate of Norman Maclean | General | |||
| Our Great Leader Delivers on His Promises! | General | |||
Linear Mode
