| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.naval.com/heavy-seas/3/
If you examine the first picture and the next to the last picture showing the huge wave on this page very closely you will figure out that the next to the last picture is a hoax. Look closely at the details of the boat in the first picture and closely at those identical details on the next to the last one. Look at the water detail around the rear of the boat, identical. The hoax picture appears on one of the other pages too. So what is the consensus on measuring a wave. Do you measure from the average water height to the top of the wave? Or from the bottom of the preceeding trough to the top of the wave? A 60 ft high ship can easily have a 30 foot wave break over it if the back of the ship is still on top of the prior wave and the nose is in the trough. "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:08:02 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote: Calif Bill wrote: http://tv-antenna.com/heavy-seas/ Hmmm contrary view has to be put & as always only too happy to discuss it:-) Thanks for the pics though, they prove yet again that "huge" waves in open water are the stuff of over active imaginations Ummmmm....ok, I'll bite. Why? Later, Tom S. Woodstock, CT ----------- "Angling may be said to be so like the mathematics that it can never be fully learnt..." Izaak Walton "The Compleat Angler", 1653 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Political, but boating related | General | |||
| Today's GOOD news! (a little off topic) | General | |||
| Ocean Temp Discussion from NWS | General | |||
| Bayliner 2858 Command bridge (1987) | General | |||
| To Anyone & Everyone New To Boating | General | |||