| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... The I-68 procedure has only been in place, in the past, for the smallest boats. I'm surprised that your Maxum apparently fell into that category. Over 30-feet, we have always had to pay an annual fee of $25 for customs inspection and buy a decal. My Maxum was 32 feet. And we never determined the need for the I-68 on boat size (to my recolllection). I'm absolutely confident that the terrorists hoping to cross into the US from Canada won't be doing so on a 38-foot Bayliner or a 42 Grand Banks.....or if they are they won't land anywhere near one of the few Customs offices in the area. Darn. They'll just have to cross one of those unpatrolled little side streets where it's "Whiterock, BC" on the north side of the road and "Blaine, WA" on the other. Agreed to a point. But why ignore the water access? Our borders are a seive, and (especially the Mexican border) deliberately so. The wages of the poorest 20% of Americans are artificially deflated by competition from illegal aliens, (willing to work without benefits, off the clock, and for a fraction of minimum wage)....thereby saving all employers some money- whether they directly employ the illegals or not. Agree to a point. We need to use the cheap Mexican labor but do so with some control. Right now they can purchase a SS number and green card and they are set to go. The manual labor jobs taken up by the Mexican immigrants are not wanted by most Americans. These jobs are honorable and necessary. I believe that the US will eventually learn from the European experience and deal with terrorists as criminals, rather than military agents of the currently-out-of-favor dictator in whatever country we randomly choose to name. The smoke and fumes surrounding the crackdown on recreational boaters is a poor excuse for genuine efforts to control the borders. I disagree. It is a good start. |