Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Give your head a shake there Harry,

Unless you people have hard proof that your cheap allegations are accurate,
why bother.

By saying that your opponent is a jerk, queer, basskisser, liar, crook,
criminal, etc etc,, means you have no credentials of your own or merits to
help you win. Come on, that was ridiculous. And for you to defend it Harry,
certainly proves your ignorance along with them. You see, you never seem to
win arguments there harry with intelligence, you only win based on how you
can insult better than the next guy, that sometimes covers up your lack of
knowledge in the argument but not with everyone,,,,,, remember that harry.





"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c3dhc2g=.370bb8d1cf69a5bbf611ce1269e61631@107 9027572.nulluser.com...
Tuuk wrote:

Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on,
give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,


The truth bothers you? There are many loyal Americans who think Bush is
a crook and a criminal, and for crimes more serious than the ones he was
arrested for in New Haven, Connecticut, while he partied through Yale.

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Please show where Kerry has accused Bush of being a crook and
criminal. One can not comment on a particular aspect of a particular
candidate's material without knowing what that material is. Give your
ass a shake. duh,,,,

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give
your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Please show where Kerry has accused Bush of being a crook and
criminal. One can not comment on a particular aspect of a particular
candidate's material without knowing what that material is. Give your
ass a shake. duh,,,,

You ought to watch the news, and read the paper and not get all your info
from Usenet. Kerry was the liar. He was recorded, thought his mike was
off, saying this is the biggest group of liars and crooks. When informed it
was recorded, he stated he was talking about BushCo. Bull, he was talking
about the group he was glad handing 5 minutes later.
Bill

Tuuk wrote:
Give your head a shake there Harry,

Unless you people have hard proof that your cheap allegations are accurate,
why bother.

By saying that your opponent is a jerk, queer, basskisser, liar, crook,
criminal, etc etc,, means you have no credentials of your own or merits to
help you win. Come on, that was ridiculous. And for you to defend it Harry,
certainly proves your ignorance along with them. You see, you never seem to
win arguments there harry with intelligence, you only win based on how you
can insult better than the next guy, that sometimes covers up your lack of
knowledge in the argument but not with everyone,,,,,, remember that harry.


ESAD.

You are kidding....please tell us you are kidding.
Like a DUI and using cocaine is alright.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give
your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...
" Tuuk" wrote in message ...
Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...

BUMP

Backyard Renegade wrote:

(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...

Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...


BUMP

Bush...hero of the low-brain output group...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:08:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Bush...hero of the low-brain output group...

Harry, I missed your response to this:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:50:31 -0500 (EST), "Harry Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:27:02 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

basskisser wrote:

John H wrote in message
...

Of course, most of this is stuff Kerry voted against.






John H


Truly ignorant, John. Kerry voted against a lot of pork barrel
spending that was entwined in most bills. Do you think that all of the
pork barrel spending should just be ignored?



John and his ilk are simple-minded konservatives, cannot think
abstractly, and see issues only in black or white terms. John is an
especially pathetic konservative, as he spent most of his adult life as
a federal employee sucking on the taxpayers' teat, and now works as a
teacher in the public school system, thus continuing his sucking on the
taxpayers' teat. You would think a konservative like John would disdain
a paycheck from the taxpayers. But that would require him to be able to
think in the abstract, and such thinking is not allowed those in the
military.

Harry, would the American Federation of Teachers or the National
Education Association (both pretty union oriented) consider your
comment (from one who works as a public relations contact for Ullico)
to be pro- or anti-teachers?

Let's send it to them for an opinion. What do you say?

John H



More bull**** from you, John? I have the greatest respect for public
school teachers, who work long hours under difficult conditions for, at
best, ordinary pay and benefits. You're not a real teacher; you're a
substitute teacher who has admitted more than once that on many of your
assignments, you don't teach at all, or even try to teach. You do
nothing more than babysit. You obviously missed the irony in my post;
the insult was aimed at you, not the teaching profession. You are a
self-proclaimed conservative and yet, for your living most of your life,
you have drawn your pay from the taxpayers, and thumbed your nose at
your job responsibilities.

If I lived in your town and were a whining slimeball like you, I'd
complain about you in a way that matters. But I'm not pondscum like you
are, and I'd never ever try to cause anyone job problems because of
their newsgroup political statements or leanings.

You're just living (barely) proof of how low your end of the political
spectrum has sunk.


Harry, I've said nothing in any of my posts of which I am ashamed. I
would not be upset if any of my posts were forwarded to the school
system for which I work.

You, on the other hand, make statements such as, "...works as a
teacher in the public school system, thus continuing his sucking on
the taxpayers' teat," and then state you have the greatest respect for
teachers. You state the latter only when put on the spot.

Your statement would be offensive to any teacher working in any public
school. Given your position, this attitude seems to be detrimental to
public school teachers. Why should it not be forwarded to the two
major teachers' union groups?

This attitude of mine has nothing to do with your political leanings.
It has to do with your denigration of a profession. You seem to think
that the calling of names and the denigration of an individual's
profession, or of an individual himself, are appropriate. I disagree,
and I think the AFT and NEA would feel likewise.

Slimeball? Pondscum? Simple minded? Teat suckers? Yes Harry, you are
great at calling names.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!