Almost all of them, such as disagreeing with our president is "tearing
down MY country"

Typical selfish conservative attitude.

Backyard Renegade wrote:
(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...

Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...


BUMP

Jim wrote in message thlink.net...
Almost all of them, such as disagreeing with our president is "tearing
down MY country"

Typical selfish conservative attitude.

Soooo, you still won't address the facts, typical lieing hit and run
liberal. Say whatever, take money from whoever, clean it up after the
election...

Backyard Renegade wrote:
(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...

Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...


BUMP

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:08:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Bush...hero of the low-brain output group...

Harry, I missed your response to this:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:50:31 -0500 (EST), "Harry Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:27:02 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

basskisser wrote:

John H wrote in message
. ..

Of course, most of this is stuff Kerry voted against.






John H


Truly ignorant, John. Kerry voted against a lot of pork barrel
spending that was entwined in most bills. Do you think that all of the
pork barrel spending should just be ignored?



John and his ilk are simple-minded konservatives, cannot think
abstractly, and see issues only in black or white terms. John is an
especially pathetic konservative, as he spent most of his adult life as
a federal employee sucking on the taxpayers' teat, and now works as a
teacher in the public school system, thus continuing his sucking on the
taxpayers' teat. You would think a konservative like John would disdain
a paycheck from the taxpayers. But that would require him to be able to
think in the abstract, and such thinking is not allowed those in the
military.

Harry, would the American Federation of Teachers or the National
Education Association (both pretty union oriented) consider your
comment (from one who works as a public relations contact for Ullico)
to be pro- or anti-teachers?

Let's send it to them for an opinion. What do you say?

John H



More bull**** from you, John? I have the greatest respect for public
school teachers, who work long hours under difficult conditions for, at
best, ordinary pay and benefits. You're not a real teacher; you're a
substitute teacher who has admitted more than once that on many of your
assignments, you don't teach at all, or even try to teach. You do
nothing more than babysit. You obviously missed the irony in my post;
the insult was aimed at you, not the teaching profession. You are a
self-proclaimed conservative and yet, for your living most of your life,
you have drawn your pay from the taxpayers, and thumbed your nose at
your job responsibilities.

If I lived in your town and were a whining slimeball like you, I'd
complain about you in a way that matters. But I'm not pondscum like you
are, and I'd never ever try to cause anyone job problems because of
their newsgroup political statements or leanings.

You're just living (barely) proof of how low your end of the political
spectrum has sunk.


Harry, I've said nothing in any of my posts of which I am ashamed. I
would not be upset if any of my posts were forwarded to the school
system for which I work.

You, on the other hand, make statements such as, "...works as a
teacher in the public school system, thus continuing his sucking on
the taxpayers' teat," and then state you have the greatest respect for
teachers. You state the latter only when put on the spot.

Your statement would be offensive to any teacher working in any public
school. Given your position, this attitude seems to be detrimental to
public school teachers. Why should it not be forwarded to the two
major teachers' union groups?

This attitude of mine has nothing to do with your political leanings.
It has to do with your denigration of a profession. You seem to think
that the calling of names and the denigration of an individual's
profession, or of an individual himself, are appropriate. I disagree,
and I think the AFT and NEA would feel likewise.

Slimeball? Pondscum? Simple minded? Teat suckers? Yes Harry, you are
great at calling names.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
John H

Mindless namecalling without ever addressing any issues.. Sounds like
Harry Kerry again...

Jim wrote in message thlink.net...
Almost all of them, such as disagreeing with our president is "tearing
down MY country"

Hey, if you can't address the issue, call names... The mantra of the
LIEberal left. Kerry ran close to 1500 attack ads at Bush spending
already 3000000000 on negative ads and still I have not heard on
policy speech telling us what he will do. Please Jim, don't be a
Harry, address the issues, don't just sit there calling names. Gotta
love the crybaby LIEberals. Dean cried when they ran against him,
Kerry cried to McAulliffe when they ran against him, now he is crying
that Bush is running against him... And in all this we still have not
had any explanition as to what this "change" is he is going to bring.
Well we did hear him say he would have gotten together a bigger
coalition but did not tell us how he would fund it, remember, the
French, Germans, Russians were making Billions (with a B) in the food
for oil scam... Just how would Kerry have bought them out? Can't
answer, that's all right, call me some more names. How about a
positive statement from the Kerry camp, you know something besides a
few lies and "I served in Vietnam".. Which you may notice he does not
use anymore now that he has been found out a fraud...


Typical selfish conservative attitude.

Please tell me what was selfish about that, or is it just another hit
and run lie...???





Backyard Renegade wrote:
(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message . com...

" Tuuk" wrote in message ...

Real presidential material,, accuses his opponent of being crook and
criminal.
Real ethical candidate you morons are sucking up to here. Come on, give your
heads a shake.

duh,,,,

Uh, anyone who thinks that was not deleberate is just kidding
themselves, listen to the canence of the delivery, it was staged so he
could say it and deny it at the same time, typical... Just like
screaming Bush this, Bush that, for 8 months, lying about Bushes
record, reporting innaccuracies as fact when the lights are on, then
later admitting it was only hearsay, then all the time accusing the
BushCo of dirty politics when they address videotaped quotes and
verifiable voting records... It is just silly. Even if I were so
dogmatic, I would not outwardly lie about it on a daily basis out of
simple greed. If the DNC says Bush is dirty, you can bet it will be
Kerry that is dirty, if they say Bush is lieing or riding on a past
record, they will be lieing and riding on a past record... and if they
say the guy Kerry saved showed up all on his own the day before Iowa,
they are full of ****, and if anyone smart enough to type says
different, they are probably full of **** and don't really beleive it
themselves... You guys just hate the truth, Please tell me what Kerry
is going to change, will he form a coalition of the UN et al who was
getting billions on the side to keep us out? Right, Bush did what he
knew was right, despite the possible political fallout, that is
something a Clinton or a Kerry would never do...


BUMP

John H wrote in message
This attitude of mine has nothing to do with your political leanings.
It has to do with your denigration of a profession. You seem to think
that the calling of names and the denigration of an individual's
profession, or of an individual himself, are appropriate. I disagree,
and I think the AFT and NEA would feel likewise.

Slimeball? Pondscum? Simple minded? Teat suckers? Yes Harry, you are
great at calling names.

John H

But not any where near as good as you are at pointing out people's
spelling and grammar mistakes, especially when losing a debate.
Remember, now John, you've proven yourself, and admitted to lying
here, so be careful!

On 16 Mar 2004 04:24:58 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

John H wrote in message
This attitude of mine has nothing to do with your political leanings.
It has to do with your denigration of a profession. You seem to think
that the calling of names and the denigration of an individual's
profession, or of an individual himself, are appropriate. I disagree,
and I think the AFT and NEA would feel likewise.

Slimeball? Pondscum? Simple minded? Teat suckers? Yes Harry, you are
great at calling names.

John H

But not any where near as good as you are at pointing out people's
spelling and grammar mistakes, especially when losing a debate.
Remember, now John, you've proven yourself, and admitted to lying
here, so be careful!

Thanks.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!