"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Where's Nobby?.......
As reported in today's newspaper...
A survey of industry experts in the March edition of 'National
Geographic
Traveler' has Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
as the second top spot in the world to visit.

That's right...second only to the Norwegian fiords.

No mention of the 'Gulf Coast of Florida'.
see ***
http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2004...ia225.raw.html
***



How come I never see a lot of tourist dollars becing cited for Nova
Scotia?



Where do you look?



Lots of places. Magazines, newspapers. As I like to travel. Bay of
Fundy
is on the short list, and we are looking at Galapago's in January.
Bill

The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have done
the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory for
the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate
highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places
simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers.

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have
done
the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory
for
the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate
highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places
simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the numbers.



Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and
what size boat?
Thanks, Bill

The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last June. The
local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was something
related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look it
up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was part of
a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in Brazil.
The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on that
size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and the
naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was not much
night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can get
further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations ago..........it
was a good year economically :-)

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have
done
the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of memory
for
the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to rate
highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular places
simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the
numbers.



Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and
what size boat?
Thanks, Bill

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last June.
The
local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was something
related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look it
up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was part
of
a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in
Brazil.
The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on that
size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and the
naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was not
much
night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can get
further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations ago..........it
was a good year economically :-)

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would have
done
the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of
memory
for
the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to
rate
highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular
places
simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the
numbers.



Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company and
what size boat?
Thanks, Bill






Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in Peru, I
used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with. At least
the Cusco and MP part.
Bill

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
The main tour operator was Far and Wide, which went bankrupt last
June.
The
local operator was very good, I forget the name offhand, it was
something
related to the Equador.....(the one in Peru was Condor) , but can look
it
up. I'm not sure what the cost of the Galapagos portion was, it was
part
of
a 3 week vacation.......week in Peru, week in Equador, and a week in
Brazil.
The boat had about 40 cabins, but was only about half full. Even on
that
size boat, almost everyone The food and service were excellant, and
the
naturalists were outstanding. Unlike other cruise ships, there was
not
much
night life, because you are really beat by the end of the day. I can
get
further info if you wish.....it was a couple of vacations
ago..........it
was a good year economically :-)

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
The Galapago's are great.....was there last April. Wish I would
have
done
the 7/8 days instead of the 4/5. Take lots of film, or lots of
memory
for
the digital. I was disappointed with the NG article, it seemed to
rate
highly places people don't often go, and downgraded more popular
places
simply because of their popularity, and not how they managed the
numbers.



Who did you go with and a cost range? Did you like the tour company
and
what size boat?
Thanks, Bill






Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in Peru,
I
used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with. At
least
the Cusco and MP part.
Bill

That was part of this trip as well, Where did you stay in Cusco and Machu
Pichu? What did you think of the approach and landing for the Cusco
airport?

The ship we were on was the Santa Cruz. (my daughter remembered the
name.) Some of those small boats looked a little scary. I was thankful
being on a larger boat the night we moved from one end of the island chain
to the other.....going against the current/wind......it was the only time in
my life I have ever had any motion sickness. And the flight to and from the
islands were in what appeared to be very old 727's.

"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...
snip


Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in
Peru,
I
used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with. At
least
the Cusco and MP part.
Bill

That was part of this trip as well, Where did you stay in Cusco and
Machu
Pichu? What did you think of the approach and landing for the Cusco
airport?

The ship we were on was the Santa Cruz. (my daughter remembered the
name.) Some of those small boats looked a little scary. I was thankful
being on a larger boat the night we moved from one end of the island chain
to the other.....going against the current/wind......it was the only time
in
my life I have ever had any motion sickness. And the flight to and from
the
islands were in what appeared to be very old 727's.





We stayed at the Monastery in Cusco. 1740 built monastery, converted to a
hotel by Orient Expess in 1996. We stayed at the hotel at the top at MP.
Refugio? Also an Orient Express hotel. If you want to watch the sunrise at
MP, you need to stay at that hotel, or walk up a long ways in the dark. Was
fantastic as we had maybe a 1/2 hour alone in the ruins before others
arrived. 2 swiss guys hiking the Inca trail. For those who like crooked
roads, the dirt roat from the bottom to the top at Machu Pichu does about 20
switchbacks in a 2000 foot climb. I loved the flight from Lima. Full
breakfast, and at least a foot of room in front of my knees. I think it was
a B-757. We were there in Spring (April) and I asked the hotel manager, how
rough the winters were. He laughed and said this is the cold season. For
those who have not been to Cusco, this city of about 350,000 people, sits at
11,500' elevation and the weather is about like San Francisco. Begonias and
other semi-tropical fauna. They only fly before noon to Cusco as the
elevation prevents safe flight after the air temps warm up.
Bill

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...

"Paul Fritz" wrote in message
...
snip


Thanks. I am looking at the 16 passenger ships. As to Condor in
Peru,
I
used them for Machu Pichu in 2000. Fantastic people to tour with.
At
least
the Cusco and MP part.
Bill

That was part of this trip as well, Where did you stay in Cusco and
Machu
Pichu? What did you think of the approach and landing for the Cusco
airport?

The ship we were on was the Santa Cruz. (my daughter remembered the
name.) Some of those small boats looked a little scary. I was thankful
being on a larger boat the night we moved from one end of the island
chain
to the other.....going against the current/wind......it was the only
time
in
my life I have ever had any motion sickness. And the flight to and from
the
islands were in what appeared to be very old 727's.





We stayed at the Monastery in Cusco. 1740 built monastery, converted to a
hotel by Orient Expess in 1996. We stayed at the hotel at the top at MP.
Refugio? Also an Orient Express hotel. If you want to watch the sunrise
at
MP, you need to stay at that hotel, or walk up a long ways in the dark.
Was
fantastic as we had maybe a 1/2 hour alone in the ruins before others
arrived. 2 swiss guys hiking the Inca trail. For those who like crooked
roads, the dirt roat from the bottom to the top at Machu Pichu does about
20
switchbacks in a 2000 foot climb. I loved the flight from Lima. Full
breakfast, and at least a foot of room in front of my knees. I think it
was
a B-757. We were there in Spring (April) and I asked the hotel manager,
how
rough the winters were. He laughed and said this is the cold season. For
those who have not been to Cusco, this city of about 350,000 people, sits
at
11,500' elevation and the weather is about like San Francisco. Begonias
and
other semi-tropical fauna. They only fly before noon to Cusco as the
elevation prevents safe flight after the air temps warm up.
Bill

We stayed at the same places..Both were great places......It was nice
watching the sun set and rise from the ruins.

What I thought was wild was the landing at Cusco is descending down the
mountain valley with the peaks above you on either side, then doing the 180
around the peak just off the end of the runway.
What did you think of the Coca tea? Didn't do much for me. I had never
experienced the altitude sickness before that either......Got about an
hour's sleep each night it Cusco. I thought the way they switchbacked the
trains to get over the mountains was interesting as well.......Did you climb
Wachu (sp?) Pichu as well?
s