"Kubez" wrote in message
...
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in news:J8mdnZrhOJUUtu_fRVn-
:

Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin
Lauden would please give himself up

"Policys"? "Bin Lauden"? Yet another poster child for government
schools.

I see style is more important for you than substance.

Jeff Rigby wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's.
Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden.
Bush is failing with the economy.
Bush is failing with his energy plans.
Bush is failing, period.

Ap
Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq
By KATHERINE SHRADER




WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's
purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his
search
for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without
finding
any.

Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped
officially
from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion

Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if
Bin
Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your
choice.....?

My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying,
decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our
country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's
YOUR choice?

ME and my Shadow wrote:
Kevin,
You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name.

First I'm not Kevin
Let me try to help you with your inability to comprehend. I'm not
coming in here calling people pussies, ****s, and general name calling
like you and Fritz. Get it? Doubtful.

P.Fritz wrote:
"ME and my Shadow" ME and my wrote in message
...
Kevin,
You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name.

That is such classic asslicker........accuse others of doing the vary
thing
he is guilty of......and be wrong about it at the same time.

Really? What name did I call him, Fritz? You see, your inability to
comprehend is making you look quite foolish. So, let me try to help
you. I never said anything about whether or not a person should or
should not post anonymously. I did, however, say that it certainly
doesn't take much of a man to call people childish names while in
hiding. It's classic, Fritz. People who aren't capable of doing
something in person, are the first to do just that when hiding. Take a
good look at yourself!

Kevin,

I have not called you anything but your first name.

wrote in message
ups.com...

ME and my Shadow wrote:
Kevin,
You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name.

First I'm not Kevin
Let me try to help you with your inability to comprehend. I'm not
coming in here calling people pussies, ****s, and general name calling
like you and Fritz. Get it? Doubtful.

wrote in message
oups.com...


My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying,
decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our
country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's
YOUR choice?


Take at least a little comfort in this: Most Washington operatives who are
competent get nice offers from the private sector, often for positions with
high visibility, which helps them increase their income until retirement. At
least we can be 100% certain that if any private enterprise has plans for
GWB when his term ends, it's to set him up with just enough "work" to keep
him in one place, nice & quiet, until he finally does himself in with one of
those really fat pretzels.

Imagine these nightmares or comedy shows:

GWB as spokesman for Exxon, immediately after the Exxon Valdez accident.

GWB attempting to stand in for Warren Buffet at a Berkshire Hathaway
shareholder's meeting, or worse, an interview with any competent financial
writer.

GWB trying to introduce a new document handling system for Xerox, and
finding it had more than 1 button.

GWB as head of the NYC Metropolitan Transit Authority. Decides to sort of
duplicate his flight suit/aircraft carrier nonsense by asking if he can sit
in front of the big subway controls, promising not to touch anything. 800
passengers are killed instantly when....oops.

GWB working for any pharmeceutical manufacturer. All drugs are renamed so
they have no more than two syllables. That way, "folks'll be in more
likelihood to want to purchase or maybe even buy some of these products".

Three years & change, and maybe we'll be safe again.

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Jeff Rigby wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's.
Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden.
Bush is failing with the economy.
Bush is failing with his energy plans.
Bush is failing, period.

Ap
Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq
By KATHERINE SHRADER




WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's
purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search
for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding
any.

Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially
from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion


Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin
Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your
choice.....?


what Bush should do is resign and get lost.

Question still stands, although we could now ask, what should his successor
do, get tougher or ask pretty please?

The point of the question is to put a little reality (light) on the issues.
What would you have him do??????

"Kubez" wrote in message
...
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in news:J8mdnZrhOJUUtu_fRVn-
:

Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin
Lauden would please give himself up

"Policys"? "Bin Lauden"? Yet another poster child for government
schools.

$25 million dollar reward, serious pressure on Pakistan (patrols in the
north). Yes POLICY such as it is, to do more he would have to get TOUGHER
and send in our troops to Pakistan. Would you advocate that???

Why the personal attacks when anyone disagrees with your position? Where
are you coming from, a disfunctional family?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jeff Rigby wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's.
Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden.
Bush is failing with the economy.
Bush is failing with his energy plans.
Bush is failing, period.

Ap
Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq
By KATHERINE SHRADER




WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's
purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his
search
for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without
finding
any.

Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped
officially
from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion

Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if
Bin
Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your
choice.....?

My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying,
decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our
country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's
YOUR choice?

Wow, so far no-one has answered a very fair question. All have resorted to
flame or personal attacks.

"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jeff Rigby wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's.
Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden.
Bush is failing with the economy.
Bush is failing with his energy plans.
Bush is failing, period.

Ap
Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq
By KATHERINE SHRADER




WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's
purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his
search
for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without
finding
any.

Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped
officially
from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion

Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if
Bin
Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your
choice.....?

My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying,
decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our
country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's
YOUR choice?

Wow, so far no-one has answered a very fair question. All have resorted
to
flame or personal attacks.

That sums up the looney liebrals that post here.