| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too, although his opponent wasn't
much more than a gerbil. "ME ME ME" wrote in message ... Doug, I guess you are correct. Saddam played a great game of poker against GWB. He made GWB look foolish with his statements concerning WMD. Spending the rest of his life in prison, giving up his palaces and wealth was a small price to pay to rub GWB's nose in it. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... First of all, unlike you and I, there are people who know quite a bit about chemical and biological weapons. Quite a few of those people stated clearly that some of the weapons had definite "shelf lives", and that the weapons used against the Iraqi people in the distant past would've been far from useful by 2001-2002. Second, you may have to allow for the possibility that Saddam had a more personal motive, if he destroyed the weapons secretly: Making a fool look like an even bigger fool (GWB, in other words). Saddam is not a stupid man. He knew full well that he could skirt the economic sanctions easily. He didn't need to put on a show to impress the U.N. "ME ME ME" wrote in message ... Doug, Don't you agree that the WMD Iraq had used in the past had probably been shipped somewhere else? Certainly you do not believe Iraq destroyed them secretly? If they wanted to destroy them, they would have done that publicly so the UN would have removed the economic boycott against Iraq. Bush is a dummy, but even he would not believe that. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "ME ME ME" wrote in message ... When you say Rowe and GWB lied to the world concerning WMD, remember if that is true, every politician in the US lied to world since 1990. That may well be true. However, as you know by now, highly competent inspectors found zip. This included people who did not have pansy-ass foreign accents or work for that sissy organization, the U.N. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Saddam is not a stupid man. He knew full well that he could skirt the economic sanctions easily. He didn't need to put on a show to impress the U.N. Hehehe. I bet he doesn't feel that way right now. A "show to impress the UN" would've saved his ass the humiliation of sitting in a jail cell awaiting trial. I'd call him a *very* stupid man. |
"ME ME ME" wrote in message ... Doug, I guess you are correct. Saddam played a great game of poker against GWB. He made GWB look foolish with his statements concerning WMD. Spending the rest of his life in prison, giving up his palaces and wealth was a small price to pay to rub GWB's nose in it. LOL. I should have read your reply before I posted mine. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... Why bother with appearances, when the entire plan was designed with absolutely no consideration for our image in the world? Because the administration gave the French and Russians a chance to atone for their sins of sending banned arms to Saddam. As the Oil-for-food scandal unfurled, it became evident that neither of those two countries would have budged and inch no matter what we negotiated. I don't buy it, but that's just how I am. So, please, cut the crap. If there were WMDs, your president wanted them gone. Use your imagination and you can figure out the reasons. I'll admit there may have been just ONE good reason to allow them to be smuggled out: To make the country a bit safer for our troops. But, since your president can't arrange for vehicle armor, I doubt he really cared much whether soldiers were exposed to chemical or biological weapons. I can think of another good reason to allow them to be smuggled out: We weren't ready to militarily engage the Russians who were helping Saddam sneak the WMD from his country to Syria. Oh boy. You think there were frightening numbers of Russian soldiers waiting for us? No. And I never said that. But there were plenty of Russian soldiers elsewhere in the world that we didn't want to drag into our fight in Iraq. Time out. If, theoretically, president Rove actually knew which trucks were hauling stuff out of Iraq You mean Russian trucks? Don't you remember the report of us hitting a Russian convoy heading to Syria (under the guise of a Diplomatic envoy) just a few weeks after the invasion started? If not, here is the report: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...nvoy.attacked/ We claimed that we had no forces in the area (special-ops always operates that way), yet Condi Rice made an emergency trip to Moscow the next day to smooth things over: http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/7133-3.cfm (You can bet she was armed with "proof" of Russian involvement in the evacuation of Iraqi WMD-related material and technology.) The administration obviously worked out a deal with the Russians. They'd shut up about US future involvement in Iraq (ironically, Putin practically endorsed Bush right before the election), and we'd keep lids on the evidence that we had accumulated. It was working very well, until John A. Shaw spilled the beans right before the election: http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...2637-6257r.htm At the time that that story was released, the White House did not condone (but did not criticize) Shaw, because the story was valuable for Bush's re-election bid. But not long after the election, Shaw was dismissed...most likely because the truth that he was spreading was interfering with our on-going negotiations with the Russians regarding their planned shipment of anti-aircraft missiles to Syria. http://www.jeffbrokaw.net/notes/2005...ced-to-resign/ Do you think Putin wouldn't have seen any further "investigations" as simply the cost of doing business? He was a spook, you know. Still is. Which means he knows how to cut a deal. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too He didn't win anything. Bush was re-elected...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Syrian troops are out of Lebanon...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Iraq held democratic elections...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. What did Saddam "win"? |
NYOB,
GMTA "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "ME ME ME" wrote in message ... Doug, I guess you are correct. Saddam played a great game of poker against GWB. He made GWB look foolish with his statements concerning WMD. Spending the rest of his life in prison, giving up his palaces and wealth was a small price to pay to rub GWB's nose in it. LOL. I should have read your reply before I posted mine. |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:03:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... NOYB wrote: The Duelfer report left open the possibility that an "unofficial" transfer of weapons took place from Iraq to Syria. Man, you sure try hard to defend the current doofus in chief!!! So, let me get this straight. Because someone didn't explicitly say something in a report, then what he DIDN'T say is, in your eyes, what happened? Well, then, he also didn't say that Bush is stupid, so does that mean that Bush IS stupid??? Uh oh. Ticking logic bomb. I like it. :-) Have a beer. He's a man after your heart, Doug! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... Why bother with appearances, when the entire plan was designed with absolutely no consideration for our image in the world? Because the administration gave the French and Russians a chance to atone for their sins of sending banned arms to Saddam. As the Oil-for-food scandal unfurled, it became evident that neither of those two countries would have budged and inch no matter what we negotiated. I don't buy it, but that's just how I am. So, please, cut the crap. If there were WMDs, your president wanted them gone. Use your imagination and you can figure out the reasons. I'll admit there may have been just ONE good reason to allow them to be smuggled out: To make the country a bit safer for our troops. But, since your president can't arrange for vehicle armor, I doubt he really cared much whether soldiers were exposed to chemical or biological weapons. I can think of another good reason to allow them to be smuggled out: We weren't ready to militarily engage the Russians who were helping Saddam sneak the WMD from his country to Syria. Oh boy. You think there were frightening numbers of Russian soldiers waiting for us? No. And I never said that. But there were plenty of Russian soldiers elsewhere in the world that we didn't want to drag into our fight in Iraq. Time out. If, theoretically, president Rove actually knew which trucks were hauling stuff out of Iraq You mean Russian trucks? Don't you remember the report of us hitting a Russian convoy heading to Syria (under the guise of a Diplomatic envoy) just a few weeks after the invasion started? If not, here is the report: http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...nvoy.attacked/ We claimed that we had no forces in the area (special-ops always operates that way), yet Condi Rice made an emergency trip to Moscow the next day to smooth things over: http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/7133-3.cfm (You can bet she was armed with "proof" of Russian involvement in the evacuation of Iraqi WMD-related material and technology.) The administration obviously worked out a deal with the Russians. They'd shut up about US future involvement in Iraq (ironically, Putin practically endorsed Bush right before the election), and we'd keep lids on the evidence that we had accumulated. It was working very well, until John A. Shaw spilled the beans right before the election: http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...2637-6257r.htm At the time that that story was released, the White House did not condone (but did not criticize) Shaw, because the story was valuable for Bush's re-election bid. But not long after the election, Shaw was dismissed...most likely because the truth that he was spreading was interfering with our on-going negotiations with the Russians regarding their planned shipment of anti-aircraft missiles to Syria. http://www.jeffbrokaw.net/notes/2005...ced-to-resign/ Do you think Putin wouldn't have seen any further "investigations" as simply the cost of doing business? He was a spook, you know. Still is. Which means he knows how to cut a deal. Seriously, we could've done absolutely anything we wanted on some deserted highway. Putin would not have blinked. |
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too He didn't win anything. Bush was re-elected...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Syrian troops are out of Lebanon...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Iraq held democratic elections...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. What did Saddam "win"? You may recall that "in the beginning", president Rove only had ONE big reason for invading Iraq: weapons of mass destruction. He gradually added to the list as necessary. Saddam apparently blew your president's credibility right out of the water, not that he had much to begin with. |
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote: On 26 Apr 2005 23:52:20 -0000, er (Larry Smith) wrote: This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. Hashcash? What's next - crackcoins? Later, Tom How abot Eruos Better? I'll be back. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too He didn't win anything. Bush was re-elected...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Syrian troops are out of Lebanon...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Iraq held democratic elections...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. What did Saddam "win"? You may recall that "in the beginning", president Rove only had ONE big reason for invading Iraq: weapons of mass destruction. He gradually added to the list as necessary. Neoconservative William Kristol listed at least 6 or 7 reasons why we needed to invade Iraq. Powell presented at least 3 or 4 to the UN...all prior to the war. It has *always* been about more than just WMD. |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, "NOYB" wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too He didn't win anything. Bush was re-elected...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Syrian troops are out of Lebanon...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Iraq held democratic elections...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. What did Saddam "win"? You may recall that "in the beginning", president Rove only had ONE big reason for invading Iraq: weapons of mass destruction. He gradually added to the list as necessary. Neoconservative William Kristol listed at least 6 or 7 reasons why we needed to invade Iraq. Powell presented at least 3 or 4 to the UN...all prior to the war. It has *always* been about more than just WMD. Do we have WMD's in rec.boats? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
On 27 Apr 2005, er (Black Herring)
wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, "NOYB" wrote: "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Hey..he lost a hand, but he won a few, too He didn't win anything. Bush was re-elected...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Syrian troops are out of Lebanon...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. Iraq held democratic elections...and Saddam is sitting in a jail. What did Saddam "win"? You may recall that "in the beginning", president Rove only had ONE big reason for invading Iraq: weapons of mass destruction. He gradually added to the list as necessary. Neoconservative William Kristol listed at least 6 or 7 reasons why we needed to invade Iraq. Powell presented at least 3 or 4 to the UN...all prior to the war. It has *always* been about more than just WMD. Do we have WMD's in rec.boats? No, we have WMOTP's. What is that you ask? Weapons of Mass Off Topic Posts, of course. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
On 26 Apr 2005, wrote:
Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Snipped ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, Get the message asshole? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
Might be time to go back to Elementary School and learn about the female
anatomy. |
"Don White" wrote in message ... Might be time to go back to Elementary School and learn about the female anatomy. Reminds me of a really bad joke. A dad finds his 10 yr old kid with a Playboy magazine. He figures it's time to have "the talk". The kid says he heard his friends using the word "pussy", and asks what it means. The dad takes a pen and draws a circle around the centerfold's downtown region and says "Pretty much everything inside that circle". The kid asks "OK....then what's the ****?" The dad replies "Everything outside the circle". |
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... Might be time to go back to Elementary School and learn about the female anatomy. Reminds me of a really bad joke. A dad finds his 10 yr old kid with a Playboy magazine. He figures it's time to have "the talk". The kid says he heard his friends using the word "pussy", and asks what it means. The dad takes a pen and draws a circle around the centerfold's downtown region and says "Pretty much everything inside that circle". The kid asks "OK....then what's the ****?" The dad replies "Everything outside the circle". grin |
You are a **** asshole wrote: On 26 Apr 2005, wrote: Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Snipped ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, Get the message asshole? Yeah, I get it. Another one goes off the deep end! Also, I notice you're quite the big boy when hiding behind anonymity. That's usually the case, inferior people come here to stroke their egos anonymously. Ask Fritz. |
JimH wrote: What does this have to do with boating? wrote in message ups.com... snip What does this have to do with boating? |
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: The Duelfer report left open the possibility that an "unofficial" transfer of weapons took place from Iraq to Syria. Man, you sure try hard to defend the current doofus in chief!!! So, let me get this straight. Because someone didn't explicitly say something in a report, then what he DIDN'T say is, in your eyes, what happened? Well, then, he also didn't say that Bush is stupid, so does that mean that Bush IS stupid??? Read the report. Can't answer my direct questions to you, eh? |
JimH wrote: "John A" wrote in message .com... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... Rove never said such a thing...particularly 7 months before the invasion. If you're convinced that he did, then a simple google search should provide you with the necessary references to support your claim, right? Here's a comprehensive listing of what the administration DID say........ http://www.rotten.com/library/history/war/wmd/saddam I like this one, my how the story changed......... 24 Feb 2001 In Cairo, Secretary of State Colin Powell declares: "He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors." No references to any of the statements they "quote" How convenient. www.rotten.com What a reliable source for news. LMAO. What does this have to do with boats? |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:14:35 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: What does this have to do with boats? Hertvik doesn't have a boat. I could have sworn I've seen him tooling about in a smithers craft. bb |
Kevin,
You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name. wrote in message oups.com... You are a **** asshole wrote: On 26 Apr 2005, wrote: Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Snipped ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, Get the message asshole? Yeah, I get it. Another one goes off the deep end! Also, I notice you're quite the big boy when hiding behind anonymity. That's usually the case, inferior people come here to stroke their egos anonymously. Ask Fritz. |
"ME and my Shadow" ME and my wrote in message ... Kevin, You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name. That is such classic asslicker........accuse others of doing the vary thing he is guilty of......and be wrong about it at the same time. He once again proves why he is "King of the NG Idiots" wrote in message oups.com... You are a **** asshole wrote: On 26 Apr 2005, wrote: Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Snipped ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****, Get the message asshole? Yeah, I get it. Another one goes off the deep end! Also, I notice you're quite the big boy when hiding behind anonymity. That's usually the case, inferior people come here to stroke their egos anonymously. Ask Fritz. |
Harry.Krause wrote:
I've seen their ads: SmithersCraft...powered by really small Johnsons. Johnsons that can't get up on plane as it were? |
Wow, it looks like you and Harry have this guy smithers back into a corner.
he must be running scared he is going to be speared by your quick wit. "Don White" wrote in message ... Harry.Krause wrote: I've seen their ads: SmithersCraft...powered by really small Johnsons. Johnsons that can't get up on plane as it were? |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:53:34 -0400, "Dr. Dr. K. Grear"
Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote: Wow, it looks like you and Harry have this guy smithers back into a corner. he must be running scared he is going to be speared by your quick wit. IT WOULD HAVE MADE MORE SENSE IF YOU HAD SAID "SPEARED BY YOUR SHARP WIT"!!! TRY A LITTLE HARDER WILL YOU!?! "Don White" wrote in message ... Harry.Krause wrote: I've seen their ads: SmithersCraft...powered by really small Johnsons. Johnsons that can't get up on plane as it were? |
On 28 Apr 2005, wrote:
JimH wrote: "John A" wrote in message .com... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... Rove never said such a thing...particularly 7 months before the invasion. If you're convinced that he did, then a simple google search should provide you with the necessary references to support your claim, right? Here's a comprehensive listing of what the administration DID say........ http://www.rotten.com/library/history/war/wmd/saddam I like this one, my how the story changed......... 24 Feb 2001 In Cairo, Secretary of State Colin Powell declares: "He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors." No references to any of the statements they "quote" How convenient. www.rotten.com What a reliable source for news. LMAO. What does this have to do with boats? Not a ****ing thing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
wrote in message ups.com... Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden. Bush is failing with the economy. Bush is failing with his energy plans. Bush is failing, period. Ap Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq By KATHERINE SHRADER WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any. Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your choice.....? |
"Kubez" wrote in message ... "Jeff Rigby" wrote in news:J8mdnZrhOJUUtu_fRVn- : Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up "Policys"? "Bin Lauden"? Yet another poster child for government schools. I see style is more important for you than substance. |
Jeff Rigby wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden. Bush is failing with the economy. Bush is failing with his energy plans. Bush is failing, period. Ap Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq By KATHERINE SHRADER WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any. Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your choice.....? My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying, decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's YOUR choice? |
ME and my Shadow wrote: Kevin, You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name. First I'm not Kevin Let me try to help you with your inability to comprehend. I'm not coming in here calling people pussies, ****s, and general name calling like you and Fritz. Get it? Doubtful. |
P.Fritz wrote: "ME and my Shadow" ME and my wrote in message ... Kevin, You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name. That is such classic asslicker........accuse others of doing the vary thing he is guilty of......and be wrong about it at the same time. Really? What name did I call him, Fritz? You see, your inability to comprehend is making you look quite foolish. So, let me try to help you. I never said anything about whether or not a person should or should not post anonymously. I did, however, say that it certainly doesn't take much of a man to call people childish names while in hiding. It's classic, Fritz. People who aren't capable of doing something in person, are the first to do just that when hiding. Take a good look at yourself! |
Kevin,
I have not called you anything but your first name. wrote in message ups.com... ME and my Shadow wrote: Kevin, You are a great man not to hide behind a fake name. First I'm not Kevin Let me try to help you with your inability to comprehend. I'm not coming in here calling people pussies, ****s, and general name calling like you and Fritz. Get it? Doubtful. |
wrote in message
oups.com... My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying, decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's YOUR choice? Take at least a little comfort in this: Most Washington operatives who are competent get nice offers from the private sector, often for positions with high visibility, which helps them increase their income until retirement. At least we can be 100% certain that if any private enterprise has plans for GWB when his term ends, it's to set him up with just enough "work" to keep him in one place, nice & quiet, until he finally does himself in with one of those really fat pretzels. Imagine these nightmares or comedy shows: GWB as spokesman for Exxon, immediately after the Exxon Valdez accident. GWB attempting to stand in for Warren Buffet at a Berkshire Hathaway shareholder's meeting, or worse, an interview with any competent financial writer. GWB trying to introduce a new document handling system for Xerox, and finding it had more than 1 button. GWB as head of the NYC Metropolitan Transit Authority. Decides to sort of duplicate his flight suit/aircraft carrier nonsense by asking if he can sit in front of the big subway controls, promising not to touch anything. 800 passengers are killed instantly when....oops. GWB working for any pharmeceutical manufacturer. All drugs are renamed so they have no more than two syllables. That way, "folks'll be in more likelihood to want to purchase or maybe even buy some of these products". Three years & change, and maybe we'll be safe again. |
"Harry.Krause" wrote in message ... Jeff Rigby wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden. Bush is failing with the economy. Bush is failing with his energy plans. Bush is failing, period. Ap Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq By KATHERINE SHRADER WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any. Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your choice.....? what Bush should do is resign and get lost. Question still stands, although we could now ask, what should his successor do, get tougher or ask pretty please? The point of the question is to put a little reality (light) on the issues. What would you have him do?????? |
"Kubez" wrote in message ... "Jeff Rigby" wrote in news:J8mdnZrhOJUUtu_fRVn- : Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up "Policys"? "Bin Lauden"? Yet another poster child for government schools. $25 million dollar reward, serious pressure on Pakistan (patrols in the north). Yes POLICY such as it is, to do more he would have to get TOUGHER and send in our troops to Pakistan. Would you advocate that??? Why the personal attacks when anyone disagrees with your position? Where are you coming from, a disfunctional family? |
wrote in message oups.com... Jeff Rigby wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden. Bush is failing with the economy. Bush is failing with his energy plans. Bush is failing, period. Ap Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq By KATHERINE SHRADER WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any. Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your choice.....? My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying, decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's YOUR choice? Wow, so far no-one has answered a very fair question. All have resorted to flame or personal attacks. |
"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... Jeff Rigby wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Let's see, Bush failed miserably in trying to find WMD's. Bush failed miserably in finding Osama binLaden. Bush is failing with the economy. Bush is failing with his energy plans. Bush is failing, period. Ap Weapons Inspector Ends WMD Search in Iraq By KATHERINE SHRADER WASHINGTON - Wrapping up his investigation into Saddam Hussein's purported arsenal, the CIA's top weapons hunter in Iraq said his search for weapons of mass destruction "has been exhausted" without finding any. Nor did he find any evidence that such weapons were shipped officially from Iraq to Syria to be hidden before the U.S. invasion Let's see, should Bush change his policys and ask pretty please if Bin Lauden would please give himself up, of should he get tougher? Your choice.....? My choice? My choice is to have a president that isn't a lying, decietful idiot, and one that will work for the betterment of our country, not the big businesses that are in his back pocket. What's YOUR choice? Wow, so far no-one has answered a very fair question. All have resorted to flame or personal attacks. That sums up the looney liebrals that post here. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com