Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim," wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: "Jim," wrote in message ... Well, As one observation, I just happened to hear that particular sermon mentioned. Had I been on an aisle seat, I would have been out of there. I was not aware at the time that the topic for the "sermon" (or paid political announcement) came from Rome. As it is I am somewhat ashamed that I didn't stand and challenge the priest for mixing religion and politics. Needless to say; I haven't been back. When a priest preaches that support for one political candidate is sinful, it sure as hell *IS* an attempt to influence politics. And Some Catholics are conditioned so that the clergy can do no wrong, I find the Salon article entirely believable, based on my personal experience. The Catholic Church was the Catholic Church long before you began your pitiful life. If you don't agree with the teachings of the Catholic Church you can go and join another church that is to your liking. As I said, I haven't been back Good, there are many churches that will bend to the wind just down the street from you. If you believe that religions shouldn't be involved in politics then you should be outraged anytime a candidate for political office or some one that is holding a political office appears at a religious institution and steps up to the pulpit and speaks. Until then keep your moral outrage to yourself you hypocrite. So you wish to rewrite the constitution? I *AM* against *ANY* State approved religion or vis versa. Nobody is saying that the Constitution of the US needs to be rewritten. You just need to remember that if you adhere to the dogma of the religion then you should consider that when you are voting for people to lead you. If enough of your neighbors agree with you this is good and if enough of your neighbors disagree with you then your have more work to do to make them see the error of their ways. The problem with moral relativism is that its beliefs go with the wind. The beliefs never stay the same for any lengthy period of time so you can never be sure what you are believing in. You can get caught on the wrong side of the issue because you didn't get the word that the beliefs have just changed. I hold my own beliefs. I can think for myself. Can you? So, you are not a Catholic, you are a moral relativist. Can you even express yourself without resorting to personal insults? You don't like your views being challenged? If you have a strong character you will enjoy having your moral view challenged due to the fact that you will be able to defend them. It is people like you that the pope hopes leave the church or see the error of your ways and reform your views and get back to the churches teachings. Good luck with the evangelicals down the street! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan | General | |||
Harry reveals his true colors! | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |