"Ed H" wrote in message ...
Ok im a little confused as usual But can someone tell me where you change
your email address at when posting so it doesnt show your real email address


In Outlook Express click on . . .

Tools - Accounts - News - Properties - General Tab

Change your real e-mail to something bogus.

CN

Tom Francis writes:

I keep mine separate and that's just the way it is.

To avoid a problem, you choose to forego a key benefit of email. You
provide no way for a stranger or old acquaintance to reach you. Fine if
you're happy with that, but don't act like it is a solution to the problem.

Wayne.B writes:

My point was that if you avoid posting your private EMAIL, it will
attract less SPAM, hopefully none.

My point was that you *can't* avoid it. Sooner or later it will leak.

Yes, it's me writes:

I don't see anyone posting home addresses and telephone numbers, why an
email address?

I get a lot of replies or inquiries privately from Usenet postings. Some
people will want to communicate, but not publicly.

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:21:25 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:

Yes, it's me writes:

I don't see anyone posting home addresses and telephone numbers, why an
email address?

I get a lot of replies or inquiries privately from Usenet postings. Some
people will want to communicate, but not publicly.

So do I off my website. I'm not particularly interested in conversing
with anybody from Usenet unless it's a mutual exchange for some
reason.

It does reduce spam by an amazing amount.

Later,

Tom

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:43:45 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:21:25 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:


Yes, it's me writes:


I don't see anyone posting home addresses and telephone numbers, why an
email address?

I get a lot of replies or inquiries privately from Usenet postings. Some
people will want to communicate, but not publicly.


So do I off my website. I'm not particularly interested in conversing
with anybody from Usenet unless it's a mutual exchange for some
reason.


Well, that explains those hot chats I hear you have with
Karen Smith. :}

I have no problems with Karen - she has an opinion and is more than
willing to share it. We all do that.

Seriously, though, I agree. There haven't been that many usenetters I've
encountered over the years with whom I wanted to exchange emails or
telephone numbers or some other information.

I have developed friendships over the years on Usenet and have even
met quite a few in real life. A couple of fishing partners were met
on the Internet and I have a few social contacts that I regularly
converse with.

So there is a benefit in a mutual exchange of contact information, but
just for thrill of being contacted by somebody I don't know, uh uh.

Later,

Tom

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:15:56 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:

Tom Francis writes:

I keep mine separate and that's just the way it is.

To avoid a problem, you choose to forego a key benefit of email. You
provide no way for a stranger or old acquaintance to reach you. Fine if
you're happy with that, but don't act like it is a solution to the problem.

One, I don't want a stranger to contact me - of what possible use
would that be?

Two, many of my old friends are still friends and those who do keep in
touch have my email address and have for years. So what's the point?

By the way, nice looking website you have.

Later,

Tom

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:55:06 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:15:56 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:

Tom Francis writes:

I keep mine separate and that's just the way it is.

To avoid a problem, you choose to forego a key benefit of email. You
provide no way for a stranger or old acquaintance to reach you. Fine if
you're happy with that, but don't act like it is a solution to the problem.

One, I don't want a stranger to contact me - of what possible use
would that be?

Two, many of my old friends are still friends and those who do keep in
touch have my email address and have for years. So what's the point?

By the way, nice looking website you have.

Later,

Tom

I've found that I can usually contact an old acquaintance by picking up the
telephone, and vice-versa.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Harry,
You do seem to be obsessed with me. For the last week, I seem to be the
topic in every one of your posts. I am thinking of starting a 12 step
program to help you get over your obsession, would you be interested in
joining?



"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

So do you agree with OT posting to rec.boats? I use a variety of fake
e-mail addresses to hammer spammer. To tell you the truth, I don't give a
rat's ass about the return address I use. If I use the same one, it can
be
easily kill filtered ruining my fun.

It's easy to "kill filter" you under any circumstances, bozo. And even if
it were not, no one really cares how hard you work at proving what
an ass you are.

You're just another variant of the SmithersPox.

"Me Skippy" wrote in message
...
Harry,
You do seem to be obsessed with me. For the last week, I seem to be the
topic in every one of your posts. I am thinking of starting a 12 step
program to help you get over your obsession, would you be interested in
joining?



"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

So do you agree with OT posting to rec.boats? I use a variety of fake
e-mail addresses to hammer spammer. To tell you the truth, I don't give
a
rat's ass about the return address I use. If I use the same one, it can
be
easily kill filtered ruining my fun.

It's easy to "kill filter" you under any circumstances, bozo. And even if
it were not, no one really cares how hard you work at proving what
an ass you are.


Seems like it comes easy for you Krause.

Shortwave Sportfishing writes:

One, I don't want a stranger to contact me - of what possible use
would that be?

That's your situation; Usenet was collegial for about the first 15 years,
and in academic subjects, etc, it was a great way to meet strangers with
similar interests.

Two, many of my old friends are still friends and those who do keep in
touch have my email address and have for years. So what's the point?

I suppose it depends on how wide your circle of friends is, and how long
you've been accumulating them, but in my case, I hear rather frequently
from old chums or casual associates who lost track (or never kept it) and
want to re-establish correspondence.

By the way, nice looking website you have.

Thank you.

http://www.truetex.com/

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:56:50 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing writes:

One, I don't want a stranger to contact me - of what possible use
would that be?

That's your situation; Usenet was collegial for about the first 15 years,
and in academic subjects, etc, it was a great way to meet strangers with
similar interests.

True enough, but let's not pretend it was all sweetness and light. I
remember some flame wars from the early '90s that could even curl the
hair of today's participants. :)

Later,

Tom

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:43:24 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

That's because the posters were brighter back then.

That was a function of limited access in my opinion.

It's like amateur radio. Once the ARRL decided to loosen the
requirements and Dick Bash started publishing the test answers,
all of sudden we have repeater jammers, losers on 80 meters (the 3900
gang being a great example - they let the riff raff in with the loose
requirements and everything went straight to hell.

Later,

Tom

SWS,
Harry has been cluttering this group with Bayliner Bashing, name calling,
trolling for flames, for the last 10 yrs. He might have been the first of
the riff raff let into rec.boats. ; )


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:43:24 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

That's because the posters were brighter back then.

That was a function of limited access in my opinion.

It's like amateur radio. Once the ARRL decided to loosen the
requirements and Dick Bash started publishing the test answers,
all of sudden we have repeater jammers, losers on 80 meters (the 3900
gang being a great example - they let the riff raff in with the loose
requirements and everything went straight to hell.

Later,

Tom

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:56:50 -0500, Richard J Kinch
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing writes:

One, I don't want a stranger to contact me - of what possible use
would that be?

That's your situation; Usenet was collegial for about the first 15 years,
and in academic subjects, etc, it was a great way to meet strangers with
similar interests.

True enough, but let's not pretend it was all sweetness and light. I
remember some flame wars from the early '90s that could even curl the
hair of today's participants. :)

My favorite was the book heads all talking about how the Internet wasn't
commercial and shouldn't be commercial. I told this snobs that my company
was leasing a T1 link from a commercial company and we were getting our
Internet connectivity from a commercial company, UUnet, and that the
Internet was going commercial regardless of what they wanted.

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:44:46 -0400, "ME ME ME"
wrote:
Harry has been cluttering this group with Bayliner Bashing, name calling,
trolling for flames, for the last 10 yrs. He might have been the first of
the riff raff let into rec.boats. ; )

========================================

:-(

And you feel some obligation to be the last ??

Lead by example and show some responsible adult behavior for a change.

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Gene Kearns
wrote:

Snipped

While you might not agree with my tactics, I have no desire to play cat and
mouse with the half dozen idiots that have taken over and ruined this
group. I got where I am by not backing down from a fight. I don't turn the
other cheek.

They have declared war on rec.boats and I have simply returned their
declaration. The war is just beginning. I don't quit.

Hope they are proud of what they started.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Do you mean the AM gang on 38.85 ???

-W

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:43:24 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

That's because the posters were brighter back then.

That was a function of limited access in my opinion.

It's like amateur radio. Once the ARRL decided to loosen the
requirements and Dick Bash started publishing the test answers,
all of sudden we have repeater jammers, losers on 80 meters (the 3900
gang being a great example - they let the riff raff in with the loose
requirements and everything went straight to hell.

Later,

Tom

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:16:48 GMT, "Clams Canino"
wrote:

Do you mean the AM gang on 38.85 ???

-W

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:43:24 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

That's because the posters were brighter back then.

That was a function of limited access in my opinion.

It's like amateur radio. Once the ARRL decided to loosen the
requirements and Dick Bash started publishing the test answers,
all of sudden we have repeater jammers, losers on 80 meters (the 3900
gang being a great example - they let the riff raff in with the loose
requirements and everything went straight to hell.

No - the nighttime gang on 3900. The guys who started the
"stormfront" web site?

Later,

Tom