Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "plantsman" wrote in message . com... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "bb" wrote in message ... On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 02:28:25 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: What is Kerry or Edwards going to do to get 2,000,000-3,000,000 new jobs? Why set the bar so high? Bush lost 3,000,000 jobs on his watch. No he didn't. That number is a lie. First of all, if you use the flawed Payroll Data Survey, that number is only 2.4 million...not 3 million. However, if you use the more accurate Household Data survey, there was a net *GAIN* in jobs under Bush. Regardless of which numbers you use, however, there have been five straight months of employment growth. By the election, they'll be 13 straight months of employment growth. It will be impossible for Democrats to say that jobs are being lost under Bush...when the numbers show a 13 month upward trend in job growth. Two graphs, if brought out in one of the debates (a-la-Perot), will spell the demise of the Democratic candidate: 1) a graph of the quarterly increases in GDP for the prior 18 months. 2) a graph of the number of new jobs added each month for the prior 13 months. Both graphs will have sharp upward-sloping lines...showing that we're in the midst of a 1 to 1 1/2 year boom in our economy. Then Bush will look at the camera, tell the audience that Kerry/Edwards/etc. will repeal the tax cut, thus raising your taxes, and return us to a recession. Then he'll tell the audience that we have bin Laden in captivity. ;-) ======================= Tell me what those new jobs are and where have they been created? These occupations have shown an *increase* in employment numbers: Management, professional, and related occupations Service occupations Production, transportation, and material moving occupations Construction and extraction occupations Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations These have shown a decrease in employment numbers: Sales and office occupations Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations (source: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t10.htm) Are they former professionals now working two jobs at different fast food restaurants just to survive? No. If that's the case, and I suspect that most of it is, You suspect wrong. then that is no growth at all with their net income much lower than it was before. Yes, two jobs may have been created but at what effect to a family's standard of living? Wrong again. According to the BLS, there was a 2% increase in "Usually Weekly Earnings of Wage and Salary Workers" from 2002 to 2003. The consumer price index went up only 1.9%...so wages outpaced inflation. That couldn't happen if eveybody was leaving high-paying jobs to become burger flippers. (source: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.nr0.htm) Quit believing all of the doom and gloom the Demon-crats are trying to sell you. They run on a message of hate, fear, and negativity. Republicans run on a message of optimism, hope, and prosperity. Don't believe that? Go through google archives and try to find *one single* "positive" post that Harry, jps, Jim, or basskisser has posted here. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exxon order to pay $6 billion in Valdez tanker | General | |||
Boat US buys Vessel Assist | General | |||
The Bush Economy Stinks...and Sinks | General |