| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
And the Bush lies just keep on coming
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:11:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On 2 Mar 2004 12:03:57 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message John, what you seem to forget is that scientists use SCIENCE. Regardless of their political bend. The basis of their report is not their political referendum, it's the science that they use, to know for a FACT, what Bush is doing to the environment. Oh, I see. So there is always 100% agreement among scientists because they all use science. So scientists are never biased one way or the other. Do you really believe that? Absolutely. Good science can not be biased. If it WERE flawed, it would be easily reputed. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! Bear with me, b'asskisser, I'm a little slow. Are you suggesting that anyone who calls himself a 'scientist' uses only 'good' science? Wouldn't that mean that scientists could never disagree? John H What a silly question! Of course good scientists disagree. Just last week, I read that there are two vastly different approaches to the true cause of mad cow disease. The prion theory is one, and the other is....something else-I don't remember. Neither side is calling the other stupid. Oh, I thought they called it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already taken. Everything I ever thought I knew anything about is getting totally shaken up in this one thread. If you're right, that good scientists disagree, then b'asskisser must be wrong. Since b'asskisser is never wrong, something's wrong. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Threaded Mode
