| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
United we stand ???/ Come on harry,,, look what is happening to
manufacturing now,, jobs are vanishing left and right,, all because of your "'United we stand""" theory. Harry, you said """The union is a group of workers who band together to help level the playing field when negotiating with their employer over wages, hours and working conditions.''" You think this was necessary? For these people to "band" together, to force unreasonable remunerations, hours, working conditions, etc etc? You think that is necessary? Why because your own self worth is nothing? So why should the employer who has the most risk have to keep you hired on, costing everyone in the firm money, because you cannot carry your own. So you need the gun to the head leverage, all this does is drive your product to far too expensive and knock you out of the competitive league. I think your spinning here Harry,,,, Lets look at what else you said... """United we stand; divided we fall. Works for countries, works for workers.""" Come on harry, you do not sound too united to me, all see you do is bash your country's objectives to rid the world of terrorism and American and Christian killers. Your objecting to your country's efforts to make the world a more peaceful place, with less poverty and less disease. Unless you were visited by three ghosts last night in your sleep, I figured you were so much against Bush's agendas that you were ready to leave America. Now your saying ""United we stand""" """Works for countrys, works for workers""" Well, to get back on point,, there is a difference between workers and unionized workers. Non unionized workers are compensated based on their skills, performance, where as unionized labor is compensated based on their collective, banded together, strong arm, many times violent, fighting, (or you call it negotiating) efforts. See, me, I am paid for what I am worth,,, You harry ,,, not the same, I think your remunerations are more like welfare, you get it, but you do not earn it. Sure you are successful in your "negotiations" whether they are violent negotiations or not. Because you threaten to shut the plant down should you not get your demands,,, some negotiations,,, LOL,, Well, now you managed to shut the country's manufacturing down. You unions are directly responsible for today's economic uncompetitiveness. When Henry Ford brought in the Army when that union rebelled, they should have made a more stronger message. Besides, I do not need a union leader to tell me when to work, when to have break, when to have a ****, when to speak, when to eat, when to drink another coffee, when to breath, when to push that button and not do this job, or that job, only do my job, and nothing more, etc etc. I feel more pride and self worth doing things my way. Remember, only 17% of U.S. is unionized and only 28% of Canadian workers are unionized. So collectively you strong arms have violently managed to chock the entire workforce. Sorry, but it fits so well here harry,,,, looks like ya gotta give the old coconut another shaking,,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tuuk wrote: The union is simply a tool to use against your employer and maximize your takings from your firm. The union is a group of workers who band together to help level the playing field when negotiating with their employer over wages, hours and working conditions. United we stand; divided we fall. Works for countries, works for workers. |