Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. Same here. I did not defend Bush in any of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. The guy has always shown signs of mental illness. The thought of the libs losing the election again is taking him over the edge. I do hope he seeks help. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the same, fella. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the same, fella. Only in your simple mind. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the same, fella. Only in your simple mind. Naw. It's all part of mindless conservatism, of which you are the leading exponent here. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:03:40 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org. You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news sources for a change. I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets; they're Republican kiss-ass outlets. Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington Times. The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats as writers. Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the pooch...and you can continue to play my game. I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity again. Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the same, fella. Only in your simple mind. Naw. It's all part of mindless conservatism, of which you are the leading exponent here. Such intellectual integrity and acumen. Harry, you are one to behold! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Tn3_b.75427
Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the same, fella. Only in your simple mind. NOYB, are you REALLY saying that you can't see, nor understand the connection? Really??? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|