Hope for America and the World
 

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news
sources for a change.

Hope for America and the World
 

NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Hope for America and the World
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered Democrats
as writers.

Hope for America and the World
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of
my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity
again.

Hope for America and the World
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news
outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a
little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the
Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of
my posts.


Same here. I did not defend Bush in any of my posts.


You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity
again.



The guy has always shown signs of mental illness. The thought of the libs
losing the election again is taking him over the edge. I do hope he seeks
help.

Hope for America and the World
 

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either of
my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of insanity
again.



Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the
same, fella.

Hope for America and the World
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news
outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a
little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the
Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy
Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either
of
my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of
insanity
again.



Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the
same, fella.


Only in your simple mind.

Hope for America and the World
 

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news
outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a
little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the
Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy
Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either
of
my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of
insanity
again.



Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the
same, fella.


Only in your simple mind.



Naw. It's all part of mindless conservatism, of which you are the
leading exponent here.

Hope for America and the World
 

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:03:40 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Three OT posts from stories out of the NY Times and one from
moveon.org.
You're a funny guy, Harry. Try opening your mind to some unbiased
news
sources for a change.




I'm sorry, fella, but I don't pay much attention to Faux News, the
Moonpie Times, or News-on-Crack, as you do. These aren't news
outlets;
they're Republican kiss-ass outlets.

Every so-called "reporter" that you've quoted can be shown to have a
history
of severe left-wing tilt to almost everyone of their stories...yet it
doesn't stop you from quoting them religiously. Open your mind a
little
and
realize that the stories are only as impartial as the person writing
them...no matter if they're published in the NY Times or the
Washington
Times.

The NY Times has a reputation for hiring mostly liberal registered
Democrats
as writers.

Thank you, thank you, thank you, and thanks to the rest of the
Republican BORG for playing today. Remember, always defend your boy
Bush
no matter how big the lie he is caught in or how badly he screws the
pooch...and you can continue to play my game.

I wasn't defending Bush. In fact, Bush wasn't even mentioned in either
of
my posts. You feeling OK? You seem to be bordering on the edge of
insanity
again.



Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the
same, fella.


Only in your simple mind.



Naw. It's all part of mindless conservatism, of which you are the
leading exponent here.

Such intellectual integrity and acumen. Harry, you are one to behold!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Hope for America and the World
 

"NOYB" wrote in message news:Tn3_b.75427
Mindless conservatism...Bush...attacking the NY Times...it's all the
same, fella.


Only in your simple mind.

NOYB, are you REALLY saying that you can't see, nor understand the
connection? Really???