Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:20:50 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:09:10 -0400, thunder wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:01:40 -0400, John H wrote: If the couple are married, Doug, then the Catholic Church has no problems with oral sex. Huh? When did the Catholic Church repeal Humanae Vitae? AFAIK, oral sex is considered a form of contraception. Oral stimulation leading to sexual intercourse is a different matter. In the eyes of the Church, 'intent' reigns. If one is engaging in oral sex with the specific intent of preventing procreation, then the Church would consider it wrong. If the intent of the oral sex is mutual stimulation, an expression of love, a desire to try something new, or any other reason, except as mentioned above, then it is not wrong - for a man and wife. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." With all due respect John, you are wrong. The Catholic Church never condoned oral sex. The sole purpose of sex according to the Church is procreation, with birth control during a woman's period. Are you Catholic? With respect JimH, the Catholic Church most certainly condones any sexual act between a man and a wife as long as the specific intent is *not* to prevent procreation. Yes, I am Catholic and have spent several hours discussing this very matter with priests who were my teachers. Now, I'll admit that these talks occurred many years ago, but I don't think the Church has changed with regard to what is legitimate between a man and a wife. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Clinton can't be all bad | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |