NOYB wrote:

I'd wager that kids growing up anytime though the late 80's considered oral
sex to be a form of "sexual relations". If kids think differently today,
then what's the reason for it?

You should ask the kids who take abstinence pledges yet have higher
rates of oral and anal sex. Maybe it's a church thing, I wouldn't know.

"-rick-" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

I'd wager that kids growing up anytime though the late 80's considered
oral sex to be a form of "sexual relations". If kids think differently
today, then what's the reason for it?

You should ask the kids who take abstinence pledges yet have higher rates
of oral and anal sex. Maybe it's a church thing, I wouldn't know.

It's certainly a Catholic church thing.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"-rick-" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

I'd wager that kids growing up anytime though the late 80's considered
oral sex to be a form of "sexual relations". If kids think differently
today, then what's the reason for it?

You should ask the kids who take abstinence pledges yet have higher rates
of oral and anal sex. Maybe it's a church thing, I wouldn't know.

It's certainly a Catholic church thing.

Kind of a broad brush you're painting with there, eh Dougie?

There were many catholic girls in my neighborhood and none of them gave me
blowjobs ; )


"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"-rick-" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

I'd wager that kids growing up anytime though the late 80's considered
oral sex to be a form of "sexual relations". If kids think differently
today, then what's the reason for it?

You should ask the kids who take abstinence pledges yet have higher
rates of oral and anal sex. Maybe it's a church thing, I wouldn't know.

It's certainly a Catholic church thing.

Kind of a broad brush you're painting with there, eh Dougie?

"It's Only Me" wrote in message
...
There were many catholic girls in my neighborhood and none of them gave me
blowjobs ; )

Did you try to seduce them with a little anal first?

Yes, but they said they did not want to put their finger in my anus.

; )


"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"It's Only Me" wrote in message
...
There were many catholic girls in my neighborhood and none of them gave
me blowjobs ; )

Did you try to seduce them with a little anal first?

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:20:47 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"-rick-" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

I'd wager that kids growing up anytime though the late 80's considered
oral sex to be a form of "sexual relations". If kids think differently
today, then what's the reason for it?

You should ask the kids who take abstinence pledges yet have higher rates
of oral and anal sex. Maybe it's a church thing, I wouldn't know.

It's certainly a Catholic church thing.


If the couple are married, Doug, then the Catholic Church has no problems with
oral sex.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:01:40 -0400, John H wrote:


If the couple are married, Doug, then the Catholic Church has no problems
with oral sex.

Huh? When did the Catholic Church repeal Humanae Vitae? AFAIK, oral sex
is considered a form of contraception. Oral stimulation leading to sexual
intercourse is a different matter.

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:09:10 -0400, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:01:40 -0400, John H wrote:


If the couple are married, Doug, then the Catholic Church has no problems
with oral sex.

Huh? When did the Catholic Church repeal Humanae Vitae? AFAIK, oral sex
is considered a form of contraception. Oral stimulation leading to sexual
intercourse is a different matter.

In the eyes of the Church, 'intent' reigns. If one is engaging in oral sex with
the specific intent of preventing procreation, then the Church would consider it
wrong.

If the intent of the oral sex is mutual stimulation, an expression of love, a
desire to try something new, or any other reason, except as mentioned above,
then it is not wrong - for a man and wife.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:09:10 -0400, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:01:40 -0400, John H wrote:


If the couple are married, Doug, then the Catholic Church has no
problems
with oral sex.

Huh? When did the Catholic Church repeal Humanae Vitae? AFAIK, oral sex
is considered a form of contraception. Oral stimulation leading to sexual
intercourse is a different matter.

In the eyes of the Church, 'intent' reigns. If one is engaging in oral sex
with
the specific intent of preventing procreation, then the Church would
consider it
wrong.

If the intent of the oral sex is mutual stimulation, an expression of
love, a
desire to try something new, or any other reason, except as mentioned
above,
then it is not wrong - for a man and wife.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



With all due respect John, you are wrong. The Catholic Church never
condoned oral sex.

The sole purpose of sex according to the Church is procreation, with birth
control during a woman's period.

Are you Catholic?