Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:46:08 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote: I've been pretty good about not posting OT for quite a while, but Tom DeLay's absolute lack of moral character and overwhelming hypocrisy cannot go unchallenged. Whether you stand on the right or the left, whether or not you find the "right to life" argument applicable to the Schiavo family, whether or not you believe that product liability, tort reform, and frivolous lawsuits are a national problem..... this information should be of interest.... http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...home-headlines ..personally, I am appalled.... in his mother's own words, apparently reality applies to *their* family, but not to other people's.....simply appalled Key words in the article..."family consensus". -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wally wrote:
Another person's contribution to the total death of this group and using the "I can't help myself" excuse **** Why is it you never comment on folks who post anti-Krause crap 10-12 times a day, or on blatant conservative propganda? Do you feel that as long as the OT stuff reflects ideas you agree with it isn't "contributing to the total death of the group?" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene - Thanks for posting this. A part that seems very strange to me: Aides for DeLay defended his role as a plaintiff in the family lawsuit, saying he did not follow the legal case and was not aware of its final outcome. The case was resolved in 1993 with payment of an undisclosed sum, said to be about $250,000, according to sources familiar with the out-of-court settlement. DeLay signed over his share of any proceeds to his mother, said his aides. So, DeLay wasn't aware of the outcome but he signed over his share of the proceeds to his mother? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wally falls into the same trap most of us do, including yourself. The OT
posts you find disagreeable are the most objectionable. Every few months you might make a friendly jab at Harry, but your not so subtle diatribes are reserved for those whom you disagree politically. wrote in message ups.com... Wally wrote: Another person's contribution to the total death of this group and using the "I can't help myself" excuse **** Why is it you never comment on folks who post anti-Krause crap 10-12 times a day, or on blatant conservative propganda? Do you feel that as long as the OT stuff reflects ideas you agree with it isn't "contributing to the total death of the group?" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|