Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg

And this is my wife. Yeah, I know shes huge, but so what, its proof I
have fished, and own a boat.

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=152c.jpg

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
HaKrause wrote:
Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg


Yup. That's me, but it was the Harry Identity Thief who put up the post.

How about some pictures of the 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat?

Nice picture, was it taken on your 50' Hatt. or the 36' Lobster Boat?


"HaKrause" wrote in message
...
Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg

And this is my wife. Yeah, I know shes huge, but so what, its proof I
have fished, and own a boat.

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=152c.jpg

Harry,
When I clicked on the file, Yahoo said the file is inaccessible.
Paul


Harry Krause wrote:
HaKrause wrote:

Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg



Yup. That's me, but it was the Harry Identity Thief who put up the post.

Gene, Harry,
Yes they are, thanks.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:10:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



The second email should work, gene.


Thanks... nice pics!

Harry,
Upgrade to XP. :-)
Paul

Harry Krause wrote:
snipped
Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.

Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.
It's my one disappointment with my cameras. Next time it's be a digital
SLR like a Nikon D70 that doesn't suffer from this ailment.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:25:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...


Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


ROFL... the pics are funny... specially the squirrel! One of my
(Army, retired) co-workers will get a special kick out of that....

Sad thing is, though, as an airport employee, "Homeland Security"
isn't all that far from true.....



Last time I was at National Airport, the TSA employee guarding the "exit"
of one of the passenger to terminal areas was sound asleep.

Way back in September 2002 (when the Democrats still controlled the Senate),
the Dems were holding up the Homeland Security bill for one reason in
particular:

Bush wanted the right to fire any security personnel that proved to be
incompetent or derelict in his/her duties.





You guys argued against giving him that right. And now you complain when
one of them isn't performing up to par?!?

"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...
Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.

What is the name that the camera companies give to that delay time?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:25:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:




Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...



Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


ROFL... the pics are funny... specially the squirrel! One of my
(Army, retired) co-workers will get a special kick out of that....

Sad thing is, though, as an airport employee, "Homeland Security"
isn't all that far from true.....



Last time I was at National Airport, the TSA employee guarding the "exit"
of one of the passenger to terminal areas was sound asleep.


Way back in September 2002 (when the Democrats still controlled the
Senate), the Dems were holding up the Homeland Security bill for one
reason in particular:

Bush wanted the right to fire any security personnel that proved to be
incompetent or derelict in his/her duties.





You guys argued against giving him that right. And now you complain when
one of them isn't performing up to par?!?







No, what he wanted to do was avoid unionization.

But unions protect the jobs of those who are derelict in their duties.