"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:25:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:




Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...



Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


ROFL... the pics are funny... specially the squirrel! One of my
(Army, retired) co-workers will get a special kick out of that....

Sad thing is, though, as an airport employee, "Homeland Security"
isn't all that far from true.....



Last time I was at National Airport, the TSA employee guarding the "exit"
of one of the passenger to terminal areas was sound asleep.


Way back in September 2002 (when the Democrats still controlled the
Senate), the Dems were holding up the Homeland Security bill for one
reason in particular:

Bush wanted the right to fire any security personnel that proved to be
incompetent or derelict in his/her duties.





You guys argued against giving him that right. And now you complain when
one of them isn't performing up to par?!?







No, what he wanted to do was avoid unionization.

But unions protect the jobs of those who are derelict in their duties.