| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
By BRIAN FLYNN
in New York THIS is the girl at the centre of a sex scandal that threatens Democratic front-runner John Kerry's run for the White House. Presidential hopeful Kerry, dubbed the new JFK, has denied claims he had a two-year fling with brunette Alex Polier. Alex, 27, was a cross-country runner and in the world affairs club at her Philadelphia school. One source said: "She was attractive, intelligent and one of the leaders in her year." She went on to graduate from Columbia University, New York, and met Kerry, 60, as she began a career as a freelance journalist. Denial ... John Kerry But a probe was under way yesterday into allegations that twice-wed Kerry seduced her after inviting her to join his campaign team in spring 2001. There is no evidence to support the claims. Dad-of-two Kerry was set to seal the nomination to take on George Bush in the November election when the allegations surfaced. Alex, who is in Africa with her fiancé Yaron Schwartzman, refused to comment. |
Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:54:37 -0800, Christopher Robin wrote:
By BRIAN FLYNN in New York "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html More links: http://www.sirlinksalot.net/alexpolier.html So far, Kerry denies it. The woman's parents deny it. The woman hasn't as yet denied it, but she is in Kenya with her fiancee. It's going to be a dirty campaign. |
Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
What the "Hell" does THIS have to do with boats ? Give us a break will Ya !
"Christopher Robin" wrote in message om... By BRIAN FLYNN in New York THIS is the girl at the centre of a sex scandal that threatens Democratic front-runner John Kerry's run for the White House. Presidential hopeful Kerry, dubbed the new JFK, has denied claims he had a two-year fling with brunette Alex Polier. Alex, 27, was a cross-country runner and in the world affairs club at her Philadelphia school. One source said: "She was attractive, intelligent and one of the leaders in her year." She went on to graduate from Columbia University, New York, and met Kerry, 60, as she began a career as a freelance journalist. Denial ... John Kerry But a probe was under way yesterday into allegations that twice-wed Kerry seduced her after inviting her to join his campaign team in spring 2001. There is no evidence to support the claims. Dad-of-two Kerry was set to seal the nomination to take on George Bush in the November election when the allegations surfaced. Alex, who is in Africa with her fiancé Yaron Schwartzman, refused to comment. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
John Gaquin wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. The American public is looking at Bush as it never has before, and it is concluding there is nothing there...but a scheming liar, easily manipulated by his handlers. -- Email sent to is never read. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... "thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. Look out John, your ABOUT TO RUN INTO A TREEE!!!......KLUNK! So much for looking past the trees. I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. Bush is toast. Clinton's worse nightmare is Kerry! If Bush is out, they lose control of the Democratic party machine. The Democrat President gets to appoint the party chair, and you think that they want their man out when they are scheming on getting Hillary nominated in 2008? |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
|
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
Calif Bill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... "thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. Look out John, your ABOUT TO RUN INTO A TREEE!!!......KLUNK! So much for looking past the trees. I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. Bush is toast. Clinton's worse nightmare is Kerry! If Bush is out, they lose control of the Democratic party machine. The Democrat President gets to appoint the party chair, and you think that they want their man out when they are scheming on getting Hillary nominated in 2008? You need to smoke a better brand of dope. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
John Gaquin wrote:
"jps" wrote in message I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as blind as you! Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she deserves allocades. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"jps" wrote in message I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as blind as you! |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "jps" wrote in message I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as blind as you! Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she deserves allocades. Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. My boat is doing fine, and I'm looking forward to launching. Oh, BTW, not nervous, really -- anyone with more than a room-temp IQ realized that this fall's election would be close. My post only pointed out that it would be convenient if all dems were as short-sighted as jps re the political plays going on around us. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. If the Reps implode, and a Dem win looks likely, I think Hill will somehow engineer a Kerry fade and a draft movement. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans ..... .....as she should out of *any* thinking American. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. My boat is doing fine, and I'm looking forward to launching. Oh, BTW, not nervous, really -- anyone with more than a room-temp IQ realized that this fall's election would be close. My post only pointed out that it would be convenient if all dems were as short-sighted as jps re the political plays going on around us. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. If the Reps implode, and a Dem win looks likely, I think Hill will somehow engineer a Kerry fade and a draft movement. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans ..... ....as she should out of *any* thinking American. Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses, as your dumb boy bush has |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. In short, she is the most powerful socialist this country has ever seen close to the seat of power, and she somehow has a huge portion of the population, particularly women, sucking down the kool-aid like kids at a picnic. Damn right she scares me..... |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Uh-huh. Is that the Rush Linmbaugh appellation and definition? Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, Is that sorta like making war on Afghanistan and Iraq? Certainly *that* qualifies as a large, broad-stroke government program...if not a solution. and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. Yeah, well, we do need to tip the scale so it is balanced. In short, she is the most powerful socialist this country has ever seen close to the seat of power, Wow! You are scared of her. and she somehow has a huge portion of the population, particularly women, sucking down the kool-aid like kids at a picnic. Damn right she scares me..... That's great. What's bad for you is good for America. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. I don't like her 'cause she's ugly and bush-bumps with other ugly broads...but your reason is good, too. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
NOYB wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. I don't like her 'cause she's ugly and bush-bumps with other ugly broads...but your reason is good, too. Yeah...no wonder you righties fear secular humanism. even though Hillary Clinton ain't one. What is Secular Humanism? Secular humanism, or Secularism, is the religion of humanity; it embraces the affairs of this world; it is interested in everything that touches the welfare of a sentient being; it advocates attention to the particular planet in which we happen to live; it means that each individual counts for something; it is a declaration of intellectual independence; it means that the pew is superior to the pulpit Secularism means food and fireside, roof and raiment, reasonable work and reasonable leisure, the cultivation of the tastes, the acquisition of knowledge, the enjoyment of the arts, and it promises for the human race comfort, independence, intelligence, and above all liberty. It means the abolition of sectarian feuds, of theological hatreds. It means the cultivation of friendship and intellectual hospitality. It means the living for ourselves and each other; for the present instead of the past, for this world rather than for another. It means the right to express your thought in spite of popes, priests, and gods. It means that impudent idleness shall no longer live upon the labor of honest men. It means the destruction of the business of those who trade in fear. It proposes to give serenity and content to the human soul. It will put out the fires of eternal pain. It is striving to do away with violence and vice, with ignorance, poverty and disease. It lives for the ever present to-day, and the ever coming to- morrow. It does not believe in praying and receiving, but in earning and deserving. It regards work as worship, labor as prayer, and wisdom as the savior of mankind. It says to every human being, Take care of yourself so that you may be able to help others; adorn your life with the gems called good deeds; illumine your path with the sunlight called friendship and love. Secularism is a religion, a religion that is understood. It has no mysteries, no mumblings, no priests, no ceremonies, no falsehoods, no miracles, and no persecutions. It considers the lilies of the field, and takes thought for the morrow. It says to the whole world, Work that you may eat, drink, and be clothed; work that you may enjoy; work that you may not want; work that you may give and never need. Robert Green Ingersoll |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Harry Krause" wrote in message What is Secular Humanism? Secular humanism, or Secularism, is the religion of humanity; it embraces the affairs of this world; ...... snip Well, that's all well and good, except that its just a cut & paste of a 120 year old manifesto. Ingersoll died 105 years ago! Anyone who reads some of their modern stuff ought to be rightly frightened for the future of our schools, religious institutions, indeed the structure of our society. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Uh-huh. Is that the Rush Linmbaugh appellation and definition? Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, Is that sorta like making war on Afghanistan and Iraq? Certainly *that* qualifies as a large, broad-stroke government program...if not a solution. I seem to remember she and her husband blowing up a few places. Bosnia, troops in Somalia, without proper equipment. Killed an aspirin factory. and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. Yeah, well, we do need to tip the scale so it is balanced. You mean that you get more as you are an insider. In short, she is the most powerful socialist this country has ever seen close to the seat of power, Wow! You are scared of her. and she somehow has a huge portion of the population, particularly women, sucking down the kool-aid like kids at a picnic. Damn right she scares me..... That's great. What's bad for you is good for America. And whats bad for you is also good for America. What executive leadership has she shown. Well, I admit, she did reorganize the White House travel department. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
|
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"John Gaquin" wrote... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. That's a bizarre misrepresentation of secular humanism. Have you no shame or do you completely underestimate the readers intelligence? -rick- -- Noun 1. secular humanism - the doctrine emphasizing a person's capacity for self-realization through reason; rejects religion and the supernatural. -- |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"-rick-" wrote in message news:KridnQEOl- That's a bizarre misrepresentation of secular humanism. Not at all. Go do some reading. Not just a two-line dictionary entry. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. I just love the right's use of wild allegations with no basis of fact. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Calif Bill" wrote in message link.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "jps" wrote in message I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as blind as you! Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she deserves allocades. Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"NOYB" wrote in message .com...
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c0p448 Why is that, John? She hasn't started any wars under false pretenses..... She (and her husband) are both confirmed secular humanists, which means, at the simplest level, that their definition of ethical right and wrong will bob and weave depending on what is required for them to accomplish whatever is their current goal. Hillary has also clearly demonstrated, in practice and writing, an unequivocal preference for large, broad-stroke government program solutions, and for substantial redistribution of wealth via government policy. I don't like her 'cause she's ugly and bush-bumps with other ugly broads...but your reason is good, too. There you go, showing your dim-wittedness again. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message link.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "jps" wrote in message I'm *sure* the Clintons care more about getting Bush out of office than getting her the presidency. I truly, surely, sincerely hope that the preponderance of democrats are as blind as you! Gotta love it...the reichwingers are just beginning to get really nervous that their dumb boy in the White House is going to lose his fall. How delightful. As for Hillary, I'd vote for her, but I don't see her as the nominee. She sure scares the crap out of Republicans, though, and for that she deserves allocades. Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850
Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
On 19 Feb 2004 04:07:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850 Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm VERY good, huh? Steve |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On 19 Feb 2004 04:07:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850 Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm VERY good, huh? Hehehe |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On 19 Feb 2004 04:07:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850 Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm VERY good, huh? Steve Checkmate! |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
*applause* *applause*!!!!!
Bush in '04. It's in the bag. Butch Ammon |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
I wouldn't be celebrating too much.
I hear Harry has very expensive taste in restaurants when someone else is buying. :-) Butch Ammon wrote in message ... *applause* *applause*!!!!! Bush in '04. It's in the bag. Butch Ammon |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
Butch Ammon wrote:
*applause* *applause*!!!!! Bush in '04. It's in the bag. Butch Ammon Looking more doubtful every day. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
Don White wrote:
I wouldn't be celebrating too much. I hear Harry has very expensive taste in restaurants when someone else is buying. :-) Butch Ammon wrote in message ... *applause* *applause*!!!!! Bush in '04. It's in the bag. Butch Ammon Indeed, but not when a working stiff like me is buying. I'm sure Butch and I will pick good, but decently priced restaurants. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Don White" wrote in message ... I wouldn't be celebrating too much. I hear Harry has very expensive taste in restaurants when someone else is buying. :-) Typical of a liberal, spend everybody else's money like its free. Bert |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... I wouldn't be celebrating too much. I hear Harry has very expensive taste in restaurants when someone else is buying. :-) Typical of a liberal, spend everybody else's money like its free. Bert Have you always been a creepy ass, Bertie, or were you simply always turned down for dates? |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
John Gaquin wrote: "thunder" wrote in message "Clintons" continue Kerry smear? Here is a link to the story you cut & pasted. I see *no* mention of the Clintons. http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html My boat is fine. Spring will be here soon. BTW, just because *you* can't see past the trees doesn't mean that others can't, or that there's nothing there. The American public is looking at Bush as it never has before, and it is concluding there is nothing there...but a scheming liar, easily manipulated by his handlers. One doesn't have to be a supporter of George Bush to be able to tell that he is getting a raw deal. Some of the charges being leveled against him are so thin as to be nearly transparent, yet somehow, they find legs in the court of public opinion. Recently, DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe charged that Bush was AWOL from his military service with the Texas National Guard. (For the record, Terry McAuliffe never served in the military in any capacity.) John Kerry ran with that theme, suggesting that by serving as a fighter pilot in the National Guard, Bush was shirking combat duty in Vietnam. (That doesn't say much for the National Guard.) In any case, Bush was a fighter pilot, not a cook. It is only slightly less dangerous to fly a fighter jet in combat than it is in peacetime. I found it fascinating that the same folks who defended Bill Clinton's obvious draft-dodging tactics now condemn George Bush for serving without going to Vietnam. The fact that Bush received an honorable discharge and had more than the required 50 credits needed to earn it is dwarfed by the cacophony of charges that say the exact opposite. John Kerry was among Bill Clinton's staunchest defenders of draft dodging. Kerry himself was so opposed to the war that, upon his return from Vietnam, he earned the nickname "Hanoi John." If Kerry was so philosophically against the war, how can he disparage Bush for not participating in what Kerry described in 1972 as a war in which American soldiers "personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam"? That's the Vietnam War Kerry described to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in April 1971. If what Kerry alleged is true, then why would he suggest that a possible experience with rape, torture and brutality is a necessary qualification for president? Unless Kerry didn't really believe what he was saying back then. Or doesn't believe it now. I submit that if Bush had served in Vietnam, Kerry would be running on his opposition to the war in Vietnam, instead of his service in it. The media is trying to make a case out of Bush being discharged eight months before his six-year term with the Guard was up as if that were unusual in 1973 or involved pulling strings. Watching Scott McClelland answer the White House press corps was a study in frustration. The press corps didn't want to be bothered by the facts; their minds were already made up. But has anybody noted that Kerry got out of the Navy eight months early for the same reasons? The war was being phased out. Yet I don't hear anybody talking about that. Bush has been accused of lying about why we got involved in the Iraq war. Has anybody questioned the fact that France, Germany, the U.N. and even John Kerry reached the same conclusions that Bush did, based on the same intelligence? Does anybody really believe Bush had information even the CIA didn't have, and then ignored it? Where did Bush get this information? Bush has been accused of "betraying" America by a clearly demented Al Gore who charged that Bush was preparing for the war with Iraq even before 9-11. Is it likely that, having adopted a policy of regime change in 1998, the Clinton administration didn't have a similar war plan already in place? The war with Iraq should have been one of the most easily justified in American history. Saddam defied the U.N. and committed 17 violations of Security Council resolutions in the 12 years between the wars. Even the president's critics are not arguing that Saddam should still be in power in Baghdad. Instead, they say the White House acted "unilaterally" – a charge belied by the fact there exists a "coalition" of nations. It exists now, and it existed before the war began, and troops from a dozen countries have given their lives to free the Iraqi people. If it was American "unilateralism," what were they doing there when they were killed? The Democrats are openly admitting that this election isn't about domestic issues, the war with Iraq or the economy. It's about "electability" – meaning whoever has the best chance of beating Bush. If Howdy Doody had a chance of defeating Bush, he'd be their candidate. Politics is a rough business. But this isn't about politics. It isn't even about what's best for America. It's all about getting revenge for Election 2000. But remember, that was the election that guaranteed Al Gore was not in charge on Sept. 11, 2001. Does anybody really think that was a bad thing? |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 19 Feb 2004 04:07:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850 Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm VERY good, huh? Steve Yes, dumb ass. I suppose I'll have to explain that to you, huh? Jeez, you asshole conservatives seem to get dumber by the damned minute. Hint, a 50% rating is a high rating. There are no opinions, no comments, refuse to participate, etc. etc. built in. If there were, say 5 variables in a particular rating, an average would be 20%. 50% would be VERY good. |
My Boat & Clintons Continue Kerry Smear
"Calif Bill" wrote in message nk.net...
"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On 19 Feb 2004 04:07:07 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:1nYYb.9850 Maybe she deserves accolades in your opinion. But I see absolutely nothing presidential in her! What executive leadership positions? What has she accomplished outside of forgetting legal papers? She's getting very high marks in her state of NY. Not from all the people! http://www.maristpoll.marist.edu/nyspolls/GV0401.pdf First time her approval rating has been over 50%. Please, Bill, will you LEARN to comprehend what you read? Where to HELL did I say ALL PEOPLE?? You should know, that for a politician to get 50% approval rating is VERY good. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm VERY good, huh? Steve Checkmate! See my reply to Steve, you senile old goat. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com