Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: Don't be silly, Dave. If a white guy was shot 28 times why six cops standing less than ten feet away, and was found to have no weapon, it definitely WOULD HAVE made every major newspaper in the country. In the case of the guy in NYC, any one of those cops could have defused the situation with one shot, and put the guy down for good with 2-3 shots. Instead, he was executed. You're right. It would seem then that the NYC police department needs a few lessons in marksmanship. A few good shots would have done the job, without wasting all that good ammo...... Dave What an utterly stupid remark. If you'd been their supervisor, would that have been your primary source of disappointment with those cops? They wasted so much ammo? Well, maybe not. Maybe their feet smelled as well...... So, you think it was OK that several cops shot an innocent man over two dozen times, and found he had no weapon? Do I think it's ok? Do you think it's proper to ask me, or anyone else's opinion on this subject, when they were not involved? Maybe if you get all the facts before you jump to any conclusions, you might find a very good reason why things unfolded the way they did. What I think, is irrelevant. I was not there. Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... Doug Kanter wrote: in NYC, any one of those cops could have defused the situation with one shot, and put the guy down for good with 2-3 shots. Instead, he was executed. You're right. It would seem then that the NYC police department needs a few lessons in marksmanship. A few good shots would have done the job, without wasting all that good ammo...... Dave What an utterly stupid remark. If you'd been their supervisor, would that have been your primary source of disappointment with those cops? They wasted so much ammo? Well, maybe not. Maybe their feet smelled as well...... So, you think it was OK that several cops shot an innocent man over two dozen times, and found he had no weapon? Do I think it's ok? Do you think it's proper to ask me, or anyone else's opinion on this subject, when they were not involved? Maybe if you get all the facts before you jump to any conclusions, you might find a very good reason why things unfolded the way they did. What I think, is irrelevant. I was not there. I should've known you'd use your usual ploy - the one you reserve for times when you notice that you've painted yourself into a corner. Speaking of corners: Go sit in the corner and drink your chocolate milk. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: in NYC, any one of those cops could have defused the situation with one shot, and put the guy down for good with 2-3 shots. Instead, he was executed. You're right. It would seem then that the NYC police department needs a few lessons in marksmanship. A few good shots would have done the job, without wasting all that good ammo...... Dave What an utterly stupid remark. If you'd been their supervisor, would that have been your primary source of disappointment with those cops? They wasted so much ammo? Well, maybe not. Maybe their feet smelled as well...... So, you think it was OK that several cops shot an innocent man over two dozen times, and found he had no weapon? Do I think it's ok? Do you think it's proper to ask me, or anyone else's opinion on this subject, when they were not involved? Maybe if you get all the facts before you jump to any conclusions, you might find a very good reason why things unfolded the way they did. What I think, is irrelevant. I was not there. I should've known you'd use your usual ploy - the one you reserve for times when you notice that you've painted yourself into a corner. There's no corner. Do you believe it is intellectually proper and honest of me, or anyone else, to form an opinion on something, without knowing all the facts? I'm sure you do. Liberals go off half-cocked all the time. Facts? What are they? Liberals need no facts when they have well written opinions to feed on. Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|