"DSK" wrote in message
news
NOYB wrote:
This is precisely the point where DSK has lost all credibility. There
are
several reasons why we went to war with Iraq. DSK's conspiracy theory
isn't
one of 'em.



"Conspiracy" ?? Hardly. It is common knowledge, and easy for the public
(if they care) to verify. Check the quarterly reports for Halliburton
and Carlyle.

It makes sense to attack another country *IF* that country poses a great
danger to us in the near future.... an overused phrase is "imminent
threat." According to various intelligence sources, Iraq posed a
possible threat, according to others, not so much. BushCo ignored the
more conservative threat estimates and exaggerated the one that said
there was a threat, all to try and justify going to war. He even siezed
the fabricated story about buying yellowcake uranium in Africa. Now over
500 American soldiers are dead, around 10,000 wounded... and over 10,000
Iraqis are dead.

And we are stuck in another bloody quagmire.

But hey, if you get a nice stock option package, it's worth it, right?


Did Clinton stand to make a tremendous profit when he signed the Iraqi
Regime Change Act in 1998?

No, but after spending $60 million dollars investigating Whitewater, the
same gang of chickenhawks that brought us Gulf War 2 decided that a
blowjob was more important.

Whoa. Hold on a minute. I thought you claimed to be a lifelong Republican
who just changed his stripes because you didn't like Bush? Your true colors
are showing here.


If Clinton had removed Saddam Hussein from Iraq, he would *only* have
done so with a broad international consensus and coopoeration of the UN.

Like that would have happened. China, France and Russia stood to gain
billions of dollars from contracts that they had with Saddam once UN
sanctions were lifted. All three countries were clandestinely violating the
UN sanctions by supplying military hardware and technology to Saddam. Do
you really believe Clinton could have gotten those three members on board?


Instead, BushCo has been a lone wolf and has gotten most of the rest of
the world angry at us.


Too ****ing bad for the rest of the world. We learned who our friends were
when Bush made the decision to act. China and Russia can't be trusted...and
apparently Chirac is no better. I'd rather be right than be liked.

Many liberals have said that our actions in Iraq has turned many "moderate"
Islamics against us. Well guess what? They've *always* been against us.
The war just flushed them out of hiding a little sooner.



Yeah, we're a lot safer now. A lot...

We are...'cause at least now we know who our enemies are. Were you aware
that Pakistani scientists were selling nuclear secrets to at least 7 or 8
other Arab nations while Clinton was President? Were you aware that N.
Korea had a clandestine nuclear program that was in full motion while
Clinton was President (despite the $4 billion that Clinton gave them)? Were
you aware that terrorists were already planning the attack on the WTC while
Clinton was President?

Sometimes, your enemy doesn't reveal his hand until it's too late for you to
do something about. And sometimes you have to do something to provoke him
to know where he truly stands.