Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net... "basskisser" wrote in message m... (Christopher Robin) wrote in message om... Check out: http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...2794264459.jpg I know she exposed her boob for shock value, but is it just me or is it an ugly tit? BTW: I think I will buy a Jon Boat this spring. Need feed back from jon boat users, are they better or worse than conventional aluminum fishing boats? What's a "conventional aluminum fishing boat"?????? For your edification, he means a pointy nosed boat as opposed to the square nosed jon boat. Bill I asked "what is a *conventional aluminum fishing boat*". Your reply does NOTHING to answer the question. Perhaps YOU are speaking of the difference of say, a jon boat, as opposed to a deep vee? Or a modified vee? Or a modified tri-hull? You see, there are many, many designs, not just "jon boats", or "conventional fishing boats". Hence, the question, what is a "conventional fishing boat"? Would that be a deep vee? Modified deep vee? Tunnel hull? He's just pointing out that jon boats really are in a category of their own to begin with. There are jon boats, and then there are all the others with a pointed bow. Any time I've looked at catalogs from manufacturers who make both, they've broken the two groups into totally separate sections. The hull bottom shape's not really the issue. Then my modified tri-hull Chapparel fishing boat, because the front is not any more pointed than my jon boat, would be called a jon boat? I don't think so. |