| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
-- _____________ "ReevesJ32" wrote in message ... I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family trait. Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the pastie? What passes for talent these days really sucks! Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative / artistic material rather than shock value? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
"Jim Irvine" wrote in message ...
-- _____________ "ReevesJ32" wrote in message ... I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family trait. Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the pastie? What passes for talent these days really sucks! Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative / artistic material rather than shock value? First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some people are too narrow minded to understand! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
A few weeks back, my son was watching Saturday Night Live, probably a
re-run. There was this funny guy on, a guest, doing a great job with one of the skits. I commented on it, and my son, who's 14 and supposed to dislike him, said it was Justin Timberlake. But, even he had to admit that Timberlake was quite good. I think 14 year old boys dislike him because of his nauseating squeaky clean image when he was with Nsync. But, he seems to be behaving more like a person now, rather than a magnet for bubble gum girls. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
Well, Justin sure knows where the titties are kept.... hehe I was in line a couple years ago for Black Sabbath reunion tickets, that went on sale the same time as Nsync tickets were going off. Talk about a culture rift between the two lines!! -W "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... I think 14 year old boys dislike him because of his nauseating squeaky clean image when he was with Nsync. But, he seems to be behaving more like a person now, rather than a magnet for bubble gum girls. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ...
A few weeks back, my son was watching Saturday Night Live, probably a re-run. There was this funny guy on, a guest, doing a great job with one of the skits. I commented on it, and my son, who's 14 and supposed to dislike him, said it was Justin Timberlake. But, even he had to admit that Timberlake was quite good. I think 14 year old boys dislike him because of his nauseating squeaky clean image when he was with Nsync. But, he seems to be behaving more like a person now, rather than a magnet for bubble gum girls. Yes, I saw him on SNL, and he was very funny! Did a skit semi-about the backstreet boys, and was freaking hilarious! He's much more of a man than people realize. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie? What passes for talent these days really sucks! Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative / artistic material rather than shock value? First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some people are too narrow minded to understand! Actually, I don't see what creds are needed to state that which is painfully obvious. That is, the total so called half time entertainment, as a whole, was lacking in talent. What we were given in lieu of talent is crotch grabbing, pelvis humping, verbal sexual innuendo and the now famous bare breast - all of which would qualify as sexual antics in a performance. Since you asked, I think these people got where they are through promotion and marketing by the right people and a willingness to act out blatant suggestive sexual acts. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Janet Jackson's Tit Looks Lousy
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:10:25 +0000, Jim Irvine wrote:
_____________ "ReevesJ32" wrote in message ... I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family trait. Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the pastie? What passes for talent these days really sucks! Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative / artistic material rather than shock value? Exactly. I missed the "infamous" scene because after watching for all of 10 seconds or so, it was obvious JJ wasn't even TRYING to get the lip-sync right. Sheesh! Then there was that rapper PJ Puppy or something... Lloyd |
Hybrid Mode
