On 03 Feb 2004 04:05:44 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

her tits are disgusting.

there is no tit on the planet that is disgusting. None.

Except to a guy who finds ALL tits disgusting.


Jax, you're a little off base on this one. The tits on a boar hog are
disgusting. Jacksons don't come close to those, therefore they're more
disgusting (at least the right one). Now, in all fairness, the left
one may be a thing as beauteous as kspraker's new boat. I guess that
says something about leftits and rightits, not sure what tho.


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

(roger) wrote in message . com...
her tits are disgusting. http://www.twelvefifteen.com doesnt like them
either. check out what they said...


Well, if twelvefifteen said it.....it MUST be correct......sigh.....

I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family
trait.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

It was actually an ornate nipple piercing.

-W

"ReevesJ32" wrote in message
...
I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family
trait.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

It was actually an ornate nipple piercing.


I guess that us why Timberlake was so precise when he ripped the top off ;-)

I just assumed he didn't want to dislodge the pasty.

--
_____________
"ReevesJ32" wrote in message
...
I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family
trait.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux
entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual
antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to
musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative /
artistic material rather than shock value?

"Jim Irvine" wrote in message ...
--
_____________
"ReevesJ32" wrote in message
...
I guess the "need" to try for tasteless shock value is a Jackson family
trait.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these faux
entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual
antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever happened to
musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative /
artistic material rather than shock value?

First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

A few weeks back, my son was watching Saturday Night Live, probably a
re-run. There was this funny guy on, a guest, doing a great job with one of
the skits. I commented on it, and my son, who's 14 and supposed to dislike
him, said it was Justin Timberlake. But, even he had to admit that
Timberlake was quite good.

I think 14 year old boys dislike him because of his nauseating squeaky clean
image when he was with Nsync. But, he seems to be behaving more like a
person now, rather than a magnet for bubble gum girls.

(basskisser) wrote in message
First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Hey Ass Licker, got news for you, the dance routine was lousy and
Janet Jackson's knocker is homely and stretched out, yuck. Just for
comparison I'd like to get a picture of Hairballs tits and see how
they compare to Janet Jackson's.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these
faux
entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual
antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever
happened to
musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative /
artistic material rather than shock value?

First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Actually, I don't see what creds are needed to state that which is painfully
obvious. That is, the total so called half time entertainment, as a whole,
was lacking in talent. What we were given in lieu of talent is crotch
grabbing, pelvis humping, verbal sexual innuendo and the now famous bare
breast - all of which would qualify as sexual antics in a performance.
Since you asked, I think these people got where they are through promotion
and marketing by the right people and a willingness to act out blatant
suggestive sexual acts.