way to go, bill. seeing as how you are telling us just how much you liked SF.

sorry, wallu, I don't pay for a woman's company. If *you* do that you are
guaranteed to get a woman who doesn't want you. That's why she thinks she
can
get money from *you*. You want her and she doens't want you and she is
willing
to rent herself out to a guy she doesn't want (not many women will do
that).

(JAXAshby) wrote:

Maybe you ought to just hire a hooker. Then you are guaranteed a conquest.
As a friend told me about 40 years ago "Cheaper than dating." As to not
many women renting themselves. You never worked in a red light area. I
worked near the Tenderloin in SF during college. Lots of hookers. And
years ago, while in college and fishing from the shore by the SF-Oakland
bridge, the funniest line I have ever heard about Ho's was uddered .
There used to be about 250 hookers lined up on West MacArthur in Oakland.
Lady judge refused to take them to court if no John brought in, so the cops
just ignored them. Black guy I am fishing next to says "Damn! 250 Ho's and
all they know is 20 dollars. You think they would have a price war." I
nearly fell in the bay I was laughing so hard.

way to go, bill. telling one and all just how much you like SF.

Now, knock it off. 98% of the men in the WORLD like women. Get used to it.

...
Calif Bill wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, you got to be too old iffin you no longer care to look at a
bare
breast.

Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one
I
didn't
like. [grin]


Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.


--
Email sent to is never read.


You misunderstand. It's the "ado" over the nearly bare breast on
television I find absurd. I'm not too old to be "titillated," as it
were. Anyone who has traveled any and has tuned in to television in
Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and dozens of other
countries has seen bare female breasts during primetime hours on the
major television stations. It is Americans who are so backwards about
this they flip out when they see tits on TV. It's perfectly ok, though,
to show someone being shot.




--
Email sent to is never read.

I think most of the uproar is over the low class stunt. Draw attention
to
yourselves as you have no real talent. PBS shows bare titties, and not
uproar. Most of the soaps probably come close, and Baywatch etc, were
as
good as showing.



Apparently Bill and I agree that television would be much improved if
more bare female breasts were shown in a high-class fashion.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Janet has apologized for the stunt. Planned. Same as always, all OK now
that a apology was issued. Get caught taking illegal political money, give
it back and say sorry. Maybe it will work with robbing banks also. As to
TV. High class display of boobs will not help TV. The medium is now aimed
at the lower socio stratum of 17-28 year olds. They spend what money they
have, and tune in. Most of the shows are extremely intelligence challenged.
Where is Ed Sullivan with new acts with talent? Star Search was not display
of the hosts bad / obnoxious manners. Look at the New Years shows. Gansta
Nation, rapping about violence. Who are these shows aimed to?

knocker is homely and stretched out, yuck

spoken like a miserable fagot.


From: (Christopher Robin)
Date: 2/3/2004 7:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:

(basskisser) wrote in message
First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Hey Ass Licker, got news for you, the dance routine was lousy and
Janet Jackson's knocker is homely and stretched out, yuck. Just for
comparison I'd like to get a picture of Hairballs tits and see how
they compare to Janet Jackson's.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one I
didn't
like. [grin]


Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.

A majority of us in this backwards country like this backwards country.
However, if you don't like this backwards country you are free to take your
minority self to a progressive country and please write us when you get
there.

Bert

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one I
didn't
like. [grin]


Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.

A majority of us in this backwards country like this backwards country.
However, if you don't like this backwards country you are free to take your
minority self to a progressive country and please write us when you get
there.

Bert



Ahh, yes, the typical Republican dumbfoch response to dissent. If you
don't like it, leave.

Bet your daddy said the same thing to Martin Luther King, eh, Bertie?

--
Email sent to is never read.

I grew up across the bay and went to university in SF. Worked there for 10
years. Still go there for dinner and shows. Lion King in a couple of
weeks. Now you would like Polk Gulch. As it appears you like boys from
your previous postings. You got a problem with dealing with homosexuals? A
lot of my customers were gay. Only one I did not care for was one who would
break down and cry when his computer went tits up in the middle of the
night. Damn, crying women are rough (and since I have 2 daughters, I have
seen crying), crying men at 3 am is really bad. Course you are probably
stuck in some podunk town with no culture. And if there was, it left when
you arrived.
bill


"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
way to go, bill. seeing as how you are telling us just how much you liked
SF.

sorry, wallu, I don't pay for a woman's company. If *you* do that you
are
guaranteed to get a woman who doesn't want you. That's why she thinks
she
can
get money from *you*. You want her and she doens't want you and she is
willing
to rent herself out to a guy she doesn't want (not many women will do
that).

(JAXAshby) wrote:

Maybe you ought to just hire a hooker. Then you are guaranteed a
conquest.
As a friend told me about 40 years ago "Cheaper than dating." As to not
many women renting themselves. You never worked in a red light area. I
worked near the Tenderloin in SF during college. Lots of hookers. And
years ago, while in college and fishing from the shore by the SF-Oakland
bridge, the funniest line I have ever heard about Ho's was uddered .
There used to be about 250 hookers lined up on West MacArthur in Oakland.
Lady judge refused to take them to court if no John brought in, so the
cops
just ignored them. Black guy I am fishing next to says "Damn! 250 Ho's
and
all they know is 20 dollars. You think they would have a price war." I
nearly fell in the bay I was laughing so hard.

Yup, I like San Francisco and women. But my wife only lets me look at other
women. Unlike you, who has to live vicariously through a rank stunt on TV.
Try a woman or a man. May be better than Rosy Palmer that you normally
date.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
way to go, bill. telling one and all just how much you like SF.

Now, knock it off. 98% of the men in the WORLD like women. Get used to
it.

...
Calif Bill wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, you got to be too old iffin you no longer care to look at a
bare
breast.

Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare
one
I
didn't
like. [grin]


Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.


--
Email sent to is never read.


You misunderstand. It's the "ado" over the nearly bare breast on
television I find absurd. I'm not too old to be "titillated," as it
were. Anyone who has traveled any and has tuned in to television in
Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and dozens of other
countries has seen bare female breasts during primetime hours on the
major television stations. It is Americans who are so backwards
about
this they flip out when they see tits on TV. It's perfectly ok,
though,
to show someone being shot.




--
Email sent to is never read.

I think most of the uproar is over the low class stunt. Draw
attention
to
yourselves as you have no real talent. PBS shows bare titties, and
not
uproar. Most of the soaps probably come close, and Baywatch etc,
were
as
good as showing.



Apparently Bill and I agree that television would be much improved if
more bare female breasts were shown in a high-class fashion.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Janet has apologized for the stunt. Planned. Same as always, all OK now
that a apology was issued. Get caught taking illegal political money,
give
it back and say sorry. Maybe it will work with robbing banks also. As
to
TV. High class display of boobs will not help TV. The medium is now
aimed
at the lower socio stratum of 17-28 year olds. They spend what money
they
have, and tune in. Most of the shows are extremely intelligence
challenged.
Where is Ed Sullivan with new acts with talent? Star Search was not
display
of the hosts bad / obnoxious manners. Look at the New Years shows.
Gansta
Nation, rapping about violence. Who are these shows aimed to?

"Christopher Robin" wrote in message
om...

BTW: I think I will buy a Jon Boat this spring. Need feed back from
jon boat users, are they better or worse than conventional aluminum
fishing boats?

What's a "conventional aluminum fishing boat"??????



A conventional boat has a V up front and it looks like a boat, a jon
boat looks like the boat in Pogo.

Pros - Cons:

Jon boat: low cost, simple, rugged, no frills.

V bottom: better in waves, wakes, higher speeds on plane, etc

You mean like a tit? Jon boat for very sheltered waters. Cost, simple,
frills? Same on either type small aluminum boat.

(Christopher Robin) wrote in message om...
(basskisser) wrote in message
First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Hey Ass Licker, got news for you, the dance routine was lousy and
Janet Jackson's knocker is homely and stretched out, yuck. Just for
comparison I'd like to get a picture of Hairballs tits and see how
they compare to Janet Jackson's.

You are certainly good at showing your stupidity.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message thlink.net...
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
sorry, wallu, I don't pay for a woman's company. If *you* do that you are
guaranteed to get a woman who doesn't want you. That's why she thinks she
can
get money from *you*. You want her and she doens't want you and she is
willing
to rent herself out to a guy she doesn't want (not many women will do
that).

(JAXAshby) wrote:

Maybe you ought to just hire a hooker. Then you are guaranteed a conquest.
As a friend told me about 40 years ago "Cheaper than dating." As to not
many women renting themselves. You never worked in a red light area. I
worked near the Tenderloin in SF during college. Lots of hookers. And
years ago, while in college and fishing from the shore by the SF-Oakland
bridge, the funniest line I have ever heard about Ho's was uddered .
There used to be about 250 hookers lined up on West MacArthur in Oakland.
Lady judge refused to take them to court if no John brought in, so the cops
just ignored them. Black guy I am fishing next to says "Damn! 250 Ho's and
all they know is 20 dollars. You think they would have a price war." I
nearly fell in the bay I was laughing so hard.

Proof that the bay area is nothing but a crime infested hole. I hated
every second that I was there. What really got me was that, even
though it is an over populated, crime infested, overpriced, barren
hole, people there still seem to think they are better than the next
person, have their collective noses in the air, etc. The best thing
that ever happened to me was getting to hell out of there. My wife,
who was born and raised for 30 years in the bay area, agreed after
being away only one year. She was homesick at first, and now will tell
anybody that she can't see how people stand living there.