Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Harry Krause wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote: He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions... HaKrause wrote: HaKrause wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter" wrote: Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were breaking over the large ships? That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set a new standard fo CG operations. Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner in Columbus, Ohio. Not at all. I think the fool is doing great damage here, not to me, but to the newsgroup in general, by dispensing his idiocy. If you can't see why, then you are also the fool. Parody Krause's posts are more correct than anything Krause has managed to plagiarise in here over the years. For sure Parody Krause actually is a boater, probably actually owns a boat of his/her own & knows more about boating than Krause ever will. K Speaking of entertainment here's a Krause lie now:-) This lying idiot has manufactured a story about his father being the biggest OMC dealer on the US NE coast, needless to say Krause then says that's where he learned all he obviously doesn't know about boats:-) Here's just one of the lies from the "father" series, try to remember he's talking $3000000 in the 70s!! Honestly it's embarrassing that a grown man would lie like this I guess that's the standard of union thugs ??? I sold off nearly $3,000,000 in new motors and boats, depressing the new boat industry in southern Connecticut for an entire season. Everything was sold...every cotter pin, every quart of oil, 30 days after I started. For near full-retail, too. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Harry Krause wrote:
wrote: Is there a known antidote for the poison in your pen? Ask your village witch doctor whether your obsession is a sign of robust mental health. You might do a bit of good by passing along the answer to others in your camp. Every single thread these days turns into you, Tuuk, and the ubiquitous phony Harrys mounting a non-stop attack on folks- (usually Harry). You think he's worth all the time and energy? Your activities reflect more poorly on you than they do your victims. Anybody who seeks out opportunities to behave the way you and your crew have been doing has some very serious issues to deal with. I think the "Obsessed with Harry" group believes it is going to "accomplish something." It is going to convince any reasonable person that this is a newsgroup to avoid. As opposed the Gould & Krause being the OT kings who have driven most from this group??? No what "we" achieve is knowledge to all about boats & boating Oh yeah & we alert people to your lies & Gould's NG spamming deceptions. Krause has actually given the socialists "money" so he can post:-) What a hoot & he had to change his ID because they've already kicked him out twice before, now all I need do is make sure he gets chucked again, my absolute pleasure!!! K Speaking of entertainment here's a Krause lie now:-) This lying idiot has manufactured a story about his father being the biggest OMC dealer on the US NE coast, needless to say Krause then says that's where he learned all he obviously doesn't know about boats:-) Here's just one of the lies from the "father" series, try to remember he's talking $3000000 in the 70s!! Honestly it's embarrassing that a grown man would lie like this I guess that's the standard of union thugs ??? I sold off nearly $3,000,000 in new motors and boats, depressing the new boat industry in southern Connecticut for an entire season. Everything was sold...every cotter pin, every quart of oil, 30 days after I started. For near full-retail, too. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck,
You seem to spend a lot of time telling everyone how sick and mentally ill Karen is. wrote in message oups.com... Is there a known antidote for the poison in your pen? Ask your village witch doctor whether your obsession is a sign of robust mental health. You might do a bit of good by passing along the answer to others in your camp. Every single thread these days turns into you, Tuuk, and the ubiquitous phony Harrys mounting a non-stop attack on folks- (usually Harry). You think he's worth all the time and energy? Your activities reflect more poorly on you than they do your victims. Anybody who seeks out opportunities to behave the way you and your crew have been doing has some very serious issues to deal with. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
No what "we" achieve is knowledge to all about boats & boating Oh
yeah & we alert people to your lies & Gould's NG spamming deceptions. ************ You delude yourself. Several of your fellow travelers in character assasination have openly admitted they know nothing about boats or boating, have no interest in the subject, and are only here to screw with HK and others. Charles Stanley (who seems to have disappeared about the time Tuuk appeared) once said, "I'm not a boater, that's your and Krause's rice bowl". Tuuk is the on-topic master of boating related posts? Your posts are on topic, and not thinly veiled excuses to go off on Krause or somebody else on your sh*t list? I'll need to stop typing for several minutes while I roll on the floor in convulsions.... Back now. But it's still nonsense. Take yourself- if you new half of what you pretend to know you would be secure enough and confident enough in your knowledge that you could discuss conflicting ideas without resorting to an onslaught of lies and insults. If you knew- but you don't. I've never met a genuine expert in *any* field who behaves as you do. Genuine experts say, "I think you're wrong, and here's why....." You say, "I think you're wrong, because I have a catalog of you alleged lies that goes back about ten years- and in 1999 you posted............. and furthermore you are a lowdown, dirty,........." Anybody besides myself see a difference? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck,
You seem to spend a lot of time telling everyone how sick and mentally ill Karen is. ********* Her line count is about 10 times mine. I don't spend enough. I suggested that she ask a health professional if her obsession with HK is healthy. I'm not qualified to pronounce her sick or mentally ill from a clinical perspective- but she's the one who says it's right to "call 'em as you see 'em". Unfortunately, some of us are constrained by a need to adhere to some shred of civility so calling 'em as they really appear would be embarrassing all the way around. I maintain my opinion that people who follow others through a newsgroup looking for any and all openings to make personal attacks suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck,
Karen has done a good job of getting under your skin, and you have been just as good at attacking her and trying to get under her skin. Your "shred of civility" in your discussions with Karen might show a touch more tact than Karen, but not much. I have found that anyone who posts controversial OT threads just so they can use these "cut and paste" articles as a vehicle to make personal attacks suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree? wrote in message ups.com... Chuck, You seem to spend a lot of time telling everyone how sick and mentally ill Karen is. ********* Her line count is about 10 times mine. I don't spend enough. I suggested that she ask a health professional if her obsession with HK is healthy. I'm not qualified to pronounce her sick or mentally ill from a clinical perspective- but she's the one who says it's right to "call 'em as you see 'em". Unfortunately, some of us are constrained by a need to adhere to some shred of civility so calling 'em as they really appear would be embarrassing all the way around. I maintain my opinion that people who follow others through a newsgroup looking for any and all openings to make personal attacks suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck,
Karen has done a good job of getting under your skin, and you have been just as good at attacking her and trying to get under her skin. Your "shred of civility" in your discussions with Karen might show a touch more tact than Karen, but not much. I have found that anyone who posts controversial OT threads just so they can use these "cut and paste" articles as a vehicle to make personal attacks suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree? ******* Karen seldom comments on OT threads. She gets angry when people discuss boats and boating. Notice that she keeps her comments on the techinical issues as short as possible, dismisses anybody with whom she disagrees with a nasty insult, and then uses her presence in the thread to write 6-10 paragraphs about the poster she's truly obsessed with. I agree that people initiating OT threads solely for the purpose of starting a fight, rather than fostering discussion, are suffering from some problems as well. Some of the previously chief offenders in the insult and uproar category seem to have toned it down a bit, lately. No point to name names, folks who have observed the same thing I have observed will have a good idea what person or persons that comment refers to. The worst current problem in the NG seems to be that as soon as one particular party comments on an on-topic subject, a group of non-boaters (and or boaters who aren't here to ever discuss boating, at all) hijack the thread and begin posting forged messages, (applauded and encouraged by KSmith), writing long, vicious attack posts, and effectively ruining the discussion for anybody who doesn't want to sort through the exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi for 6-8 posts before finding maybe one or two more actual comments on the subject at hand. If a person cuts and pastes an anti-war, anti-Bush, or pro-war, pro-Bush whatever item into the NG, he or she deserves whatever crap results in the thread. It's regrettable that petty personal arguments, bickering, and feuds invade every single thread on any subject these days. The schidt-flinging, non-boating, troublemakers should have the decency not to screw up the on topic discussions with unprovoked personal attacks on the participants. My two cents worth, here- you can have the soap box back now. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Chuck, Karen has done a good job of getting under your skin, and you have been just as good at attacking her and trying to get under her skin. Your "shred of civility" in your discussions with Karen might show a touch more tact than Karen, but not much. I have found that anyone who posts controversial OT threads just so they can use these "cut and paste" articles as a vehicle to make personal attacks suffer from some serious issues. Do you disagree? ******* Karen seldom comments on OT threads. She gets angry when people discuss boats and boating. Notice that she keeps her comments on the techinical issues as short as possible, dismisses anybody with whom she disagrees with a nasty insult, and then uses her presence in the thread to write 6-10 paragraphs about the poster she's truly obsessed with. I agree that people initiating OT threads solely for the purpose of starting a fight, rather than fostering discussion, are suffering from some problems as well. Some of the previously chief offenders in the insult and uproar category seem to have toned it down a bit, lately. No point to name names, folks who have observed the same thing I have observed will have a good idea what person or persons that comment refers to. The worst current problem in the NG seems to be that as soon as one particular party comments on an on-topic subject, a group of non-boaters (and or boaters who aren't here to ever discuss boating, at all) hijack the thread and begin posting forged messages, (applauded and encouraged by KSmith), writing long, vicious attack posts, and effectively ruining the discussion for anybody who doesn't want to sort through the exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi for 6-8 posts before finding maybe one or two more actual comments on the subject at hand. If a person cuts and pastes an anti-war, anti-Bush, or pro-war, pro-Bush whatever item into the NG, he or she deserves whatever crap results in the thread. It's regrettable that petty personal arguments, bickering, and feuds invade every single thread on any subject these days. The schidt-flinging, non-boating, troublemakers should have the decency not to screw up the on topic discussions with unprovoked personal attacks on the participants. My two cents worth, here- you can have the soap box back now. You make yourself sound so innocent of any wrongdoings Chuck....but we all know better. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Large Electric Outboard... | General | |||
Rogue Waves - Reuters | ASA | |||
Large rowboat for large family | Boat Building | |||
Monster waves | ASA | |||
Invest small Earn Large ($20 000+) | Tall Ships |