"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

Interesting idea, but there are problems with it.

1) There is little or no reason for us not to go after it, whether Syria
likes it or not.

Well, whether you want to believe it or not, there is a limit to the number
of things we can do simultaneously on the ground. And, as they have done in
past circumstances, they will try the diplomatic route first. When and if
that fails, look for boots on the ground.

we've already demonstrated that we have little or no regard for the
sovereignty of other countries. Why not just tell the Bashar al-Asad that
we're stopping by for a little visit?

disregard puerile rant

2) It's still a condemnation of the cowboy who waved his dick at Saddam
for
close to a year before actually doing anything. You want a great
conspiracy
theory? Bush *wanted* to give Saddam plenty of time to move the stuff over
the border.

Let's assume for the moment that you're on the right track. How does that
jibe with your oft-repeated premise that GW is an incompetent moron who
couldn't find his ass with two hands and a flashlight? Morons are not
usually adept at strategic chess.

cowards hide behind fake email names.. if the shoe fits........

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

Interesting idea, but there are problems with it.

1) There is little or no reason for us not to go after it, whether Syria
likes it or not.

Well, whether you want to believe it or not, there is a limit to the
number
of things we can do simultaneously on the ground. And, as they have done
in
past circumstances, they will try the diplomatic route first. When and if
that fails, look for boots on the ground.

we've already demonstrated that we have little or no regard for the
sovereignty of other countries. Why not just tell the Bashar al-Asad
that
we're stopping by for a little visit?

disregard puerile rant

2) It's still a condemnation of the cowboy who waved his dick at Saddam
for
close to a year before actually doing anything. You want a great
conspiracy
theory? Bush *wanted* to give Saddam plenty of time to move the stuff
over
the border.

Let's assume for the moment that you're on the right track. How does that
jibe with your oft-repeated premise that GW is an incompetent moron who
couldn't find his ass with two hands and a flashlight? Morons are not
usually adept at strategic chess.

He's not adept, but his sitters are. So is his father, who started all this.
Who knows what he'd do to insure that his boy had an income stream after the
next election?

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

Interesting idea, but there are problems with it.

1) There is little or no reason for us not to go after it, whether
Syria
likes it or not.

Well, whether you want to believe it or not, there is a limit to the
number
of things we can do simultaneously on the ground. And, as they have
done
in
past circumstances, they will try the diplomatic route first. When and
if
that fails, look for boots on the ground.

we've already demonstrated that we have little or no regard for the
sovereignty of other countries. Why not just tell the Bashar al-Asad
that
we're stopping by for a little visit?

disregard puerile rant

2) It's still a condemnation of the cowboy who waved his dick at
Saddam
for
close to a year before actually doing anything. You want a great
conspiracy
theory? Bush *wanted* to give Saddam plenty of time to move the stuff
over
the border.

Let's assume for the moment that you're on the right track. How does
that
jibe with your oft-repeated premise that GW is an incompetent moron who
couldn't find his ass with two hands and a flashlight? Morons are not
usually adept at strategic chess.

He's not adept, but his sitters are. So is his father, who started all
this.
Who knows what he'd do to insure that his boy had an income stream after
the
next election?

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell out of
Syria.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell out of
Syria.


Yes. Syria. Another major threat to the U.S. Idiot.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell out
of
Syria.


Yes. Syria. Another major threat to the U.S. Idiot.

Doug,
I'm not sure what has happened to you, but you're beginning to descend to
name-calling, foul-mouthed depths of the basskisser.

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell out
of
Syria.


Yes. Syria. Another major threat to the U.S. Idiot.

Doug,
I'm not sure what has happened to you, but you're beginning to descend to
name-calling, foul-mouthed depths of the basskisser.

OK. I'm sorry. I'll switch to a method gleaned from all the parenting books:
Sometimes smart people say stupid things. To consider Syria a threat is to
say a stupid thing. Better?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters")
might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?


I can think of a reason:
When Saddam sends the weapons to Syria, we can then blast the hell
out
of
Syria.


Yes. Syria. Another major threat to the U.S. Idiot.

Doug,
I'm not sure what has happened to you, but you're beginning to descend
to
name-calling, foul-mouthed depths of the basskisser.

OK. I'm sorry. I'll switch to a method gleaned from all the parenting
books:
Sometimes smart people say stupid things. To consider Syria a threat is to
say a stupid thing. Better?

Not really. Syria has WMD's and financially supports Hezbollah. You don't
think that makes them a threat?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters") might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?

Only "both"? I can think of several scenarios. Iraq is just one piece of
the puzzle. Right now, the entire Arab/Islamic axis, from Algeria to the
Hindu Kush, is in flux. If all you watch is Iraq, you're liable to miss the
show.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
Have you thought about both reasons why Nookular Boy (meaning "his
sitters") might've wanted to give Saddam time to clean up his back yard?

Only "both"? I can think of several scenarios. Iraq is just one piece of
the puzzle. Right now, the entire Arab/Islamic axis, from Algeria to the
Hindu Kush, is in flux. If all you watch is Iraq, you're liable to miss
the
show.



I suspect that EVERY country in that arc is full of people who just want to
send their kids to school and put dinner on the table every night. Just like
here. In your mind, though, it probably makes perfect sense to bomb the
bejeezus out of all of them in order to nail the 1% of the population
comprised of lunatics. Lunatics like George.