LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:39:28 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:13:03 -0500, "P. Fritz"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:34:45 -0500, "P. Fritz"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:44:15 -0500, "P.Fritz"

wrote:


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

The strongest indication that Terri could have given as to
what
she
wanted would have been formally assigning DPOA to her
husband.

And the strongest evidence that her husband could have given
was
announcing her desire immediately, not years later when he was
impregnating someone else.

Bingo! Why didn't he attempt to grant Terri's supposed wishes
14
years
earlier? His timing speaks volumes about the validity of his
claim.





The courts should have appointed a 3rd party guardian for her,
but
from
what I understand, the parents were outlawyerd and once the
judgement
was
entered, the high courts could only rule on the validity of the
lower
court
ruling.....not retry the facts of the case.


Guardians were appointed in 1994 and again in 1998 by the court.
Although the
second one stated that Michael Schiavo's decision-making may be
influenced by
the potential to inherit the remainder of Terri Schiavo's estate,
he
agreed that
Terry Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state.

Then why was it not the guardian making the decisions?

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


They had no problems with the decisions made by Michael, other than as
mentioned
above.

My point is that if a guardian was appointed, Michael should not have
been able to make any decisions.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


Maybe it *was* the guardians making the decisions, but they happened to
concur
with Michael's wishes.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."


And maybe not.


True, but the judge didn't take the guardianship away from Michael.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
( OT ) Terri Schiavo and the fight over Bush's judges Jim, General 13 March 31st 05 06:28 PM
( OT ) The Politicization of Terri Schiavo Jim, General 96 March 29th 05 03:31 PM
( OT ) Down with the judicial tyrants who are killing Terri Schiavo! Jim, General 0 March 28th 05 08:19 PM
( OT ) Down with the judicial tyrants who are killing Terri Schiavo! Jim, General 0 March 25th 05 02:43 PM
The same people Simple Simon ASA 28 July 23rd 03 03:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017