Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim," wrote in message ... wrote: The value added tax will greatly increase the cost of goods, thus affecting the poor much more than the wealthy. ************** That's why sales taxes are usually considered regressive. The poor are compelled to spend 100% of their income on basic needs. The wealthy spend as little as only a few percent on basic needs and merchandise subject to VAT or sales tax, with a higher percentage spent on services and travel and a very high percentage on investment. When you go to a poor person and say, "VAT is 20%, so give me 20% of what your earn" that can hurt a lot worse, (even though it's a lot less money), than approaching a wealthy person with "VAT is 20% and you spend 25% of your earnings on taxable items so hand over 5%". Flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax. No tax on the first $30,000 or so per family per year, then a fixed rate of 15-20% on all earnings above that regardless of source. It's very fair, doesn't burden the poor with any tax at all, and takes a fixed, predictable, even percentage from everybody else without special favors or exemptions. This is why I asked you to read the article before commenting. The VAT would be partially refunded based on income, and there would be an income tax on those earning in excess of 100k/yr Please read the article! That's fair? And the politico's get more money, without the people realizing how bad they is screwed. How much is the rebate? What if the poor person is mostly buying food, which will be exempt, as political suicide to tax basic groceries. Oh, now we have a national sales tax. We just raise it anytime more money is wanted. California had a 3% sales tax in my youth, about 40 years ago. Now it is 8.25% and they keep raising it for every special desire. Was in Italy in October. VAT was 20%. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Calif Bill wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message ... wrote: The value added tax will greatly increase the cost of goods, thus affecting the poor much more than the wealthy. ************** That's why sales taxes are usually considered regressive. The poor are compelled to spend 100% of their income on basic needs. The wealthy spend as little as only a few percent on basic needs and merchandise subject to VAT or sales tax, with a higher percentage spent on services and travel and a very high percentage on investment. When you go to a poor person and say, "VAT is 20%, so give me 20% of what your earn" that can hurt a lot worse, (even though it's a lot less money), than approaching a wealthy person with "VAT is 20% and you spend 25% of your earnings on taxable items so hand over 5%". Flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax. No tax on the first $30,000 or so per family per year, then a fixed rate of 15-20% on all earnings above that regardless of source. It's very fair, doesn't burden the poor with any tax at all, and takes a fixed, predictable, even percentage from everybody else without special favors or exemptions. This is why I asked you to read the article before commenting. The VAT would be partially refunded based on income, and there would be an income tax on those earning in excess of 100k/yr Please read the article! That's fair? And the politico's get more money, without the people realizing how bad they is screwed. How much is the rebate? What if the poor person is mostly buying food, which will be exempt, as political suicide to tax basic groceries. Oh, now we have a national sales tax. We just raise it anytime more money is wanted. California had a 3% sales tax in my youth, about 40 years ago. Now it is 8.25% and they keep raising it for every special desire. Was in Italy in October. VAT was 20%. Dunno that any tax is "fair"; but maybe at least we could understand it. Why should it co$t me $80 just to have someone help me figure out how much the government is going to take away from me? Gotta be a better way than what we have now -- and I see this as a good place to start discussing things. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:27:31 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:
California had a 3% sales tax in my youth, about 40 years ago. Now it is 8.25% and they keep raising it for every special desire. Was in Italy in October. VAT was 20%. You are hitting on one of the major problems. Surprisingly, as a percent of GDP, the federal tax burden has been rather constant, @ 18% give or take. What hasn't been constant, has been the growth in state taxes. I've heard many at the state level complain about the federal government mandating programs, but not funding those programs. I don't know how true that is, but it does seem the major growth in taxes has been at the state level. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/TaxFa...e.cfm?Docid=14 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Calif Bill" wrote in message news "Jim," wrote in message ... wrote: The value added tax will greatly increase the cost of goods, thus affecting the poor much more than the wealthy. ************** That's why sales taxes are usually considered regressive. The poor are compelled to spend 100% of their income on basic needs. The wealthy spend as little as only a few percent on basic needs and merchandise subject to VAT or sales tax, with a higher percentage spent on services and travel and a very high percentage on investment. When you go to a poor person and say, "VAT is 20%, so give me 20% of what your earn" that can hurt a lot worse, (even though it's a lot less money), than approaching a wealthy person with "VAT is 20% and you spend 25% of your earnings on taxable items so hand over 5%". Flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax. No tax on the first $30,000 or so per family per year, then a fixed rate of 15-20% on all earnings above that regardless of source. It's very fair, doesn't burden the poor with any tax at all, and takes a fixed, predictable, even percentage from everybody else without special favors or exemptions. This is why I asked you to read the article before commenting. The VAT would be partially refunded based on income, and there would be an income tax on those earning in excess of 100k/yr Please read the article! That's fair? And the politico's get more money, without the people realizing how bad they is screwed. How much is the rebate? What if the poor person is mostly buying food, which will be exempt, as political suicide to tax basic groceries. Oh, now we have a national sales tax. We just raise it anytime more money is wanted. California had a 3% sales tax in my youth, about 40 years ago. Now it is 8.25% and they keep raising it for every special desire. Was in Italy in October. VAT was 20%. And the income tax on excess of 100k is simply more class warfare BS. The original income tax as only on the 'very wealthy" now look at it. Same with SS The flat tax is the only way to get the power away from the beltway crowd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Calif Bill wrote:
"Jim," wrote in message ... wrote: The value added tax will greatly increase the cost of goods, thus affecting the poor much more than the wealthy. ************** That's why sales taxes are usually considered regressive. The poor are compelled to spend 100% of their income on basic needs. The wealthy spend as little as only a few percent on basic needs and merchandise subject to VAT or sales tax, with a higher percentage spent on services and travel and a very high percentage on investment. When you go to a poor person and say, "VAT is 20%, so give me 20% of what your earn" that can hurt a lot worse, (even though it's a lot less money), than approaching a wealthy person with "VAT is 20% and you spend 25% of your earnings on taxable items so hand over 5%". Flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax, flat tax. No tax on the first $30,000 or so per family per year, then a fixed rate of 15-20% on all earnings above that regardless of source. It's very fair, doesn't burden the poor with any tax at all, and takes a fixed, predictable, even percentage from everybody else without special favors or exemptions. This is why I asked you to read the article before commenting. The VAT would be partially refunded based on income, and there would be an income tax on those earning in excess of 100k/yr Please read the article! That's fair? And the politico's get more money, without the people realizing how bad they is screwed. How much is the rebate? What if the poor person is mostly buying food, which will be exempt, as political suicide to tax basic groceries. Oh, now we have a national sales tax. We just raise it anytime more money is wanted. California had a 3% sales tax in my youth, about 40 years ago. Now it is 8.25% and they keep raising it for every special desire. Was in Italy in October. VAT was 20%. Dunno that any tax is "fair"; but maybe at least we could understand it. Why should it co$t me $80 just to have someone help me figure out how much the government is going to take away from me? Gotta be a better way than what we have now -- and I see this as a good place to start discussing things. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Maryland taxes S**T | General | |||
Taxes and Duties on Boats in Thailand | Cruising |