Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:51:04 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:01:20 -0500, HKrause wrote: It was her wish to die. Not legally. There is no final legally binding document indicating that was her wish. In fact, even if there was, she could have, at any point, said to somebody that she wished for extraordinary measures and you would have the same situation you have now. The flip side is that if she could speak, she could insist that she be given NO care whatsoever after a certain point. No food, no medicine, no water, no nothing. By law, nobody can override that request from the patient. Period. It should have at least been in writing, and she should've had a long discussion with her doctor, the lawyer who handled her will, and one or two trusted "others". You'e right. She *could have*... As she didn't, the courts must make a determination. She is getting her shot at due process. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT (not political) Terri will soon be gone | General |