On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:44:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


Of course, one may ask, "What is 'due process of law'?"

One may also ask how long we will put up with people interfering in family
decisions. If you had communicated to your wife what that woman told her
husband, but you had not put it in writing yet, and you were in her
condition, your wife would be going through this exact same bull****. And
that's EXACTLY what it is.


"...nor shall any state deprive any person of life..."

*You* don't know what she said, if anything, to her husband. Apparently 19
Florida judges couldn't figure it out for sure, unless the last one is
always
right.

Almost half the Democrats who voted in the House voted *for* the measure.
Why
are there no complaints against them?

The party affiliation of those who voted for it is irrelevant. It is an
intrusion.

When Jimcomma started this, he stated, "Now President George W.
Bush, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN) are using the
tragic case of Schiavo..."

I assumed you agreed with his position.

My question to you would be, "Why should Scott Peterson get a Supreme Court
hearing, and Schiavo not? Apparently some judges felt their was enough doubt
about the husbands motives and her desires to rule for leaving the feeding tube
in place.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."